public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "drivers: core: synchronize really_probe() and dev_uevent()"
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:13:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025022051-happy-plant-b40b@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250220064647.2437048-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 10:46:44PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> This reverts commit c0a40097f0bc81deafc15f9195d1fb54595cd6d0.
> 
> Probing a device can take arbitrary long time. In the field we observed
> that, for example, probing a bad micro-SD cards in an external USB card
> reader (or maybe cards were good but cables were flaky) sometimes takes
> longer than 2 minutes due to multiple retries at various levels of the
> stack. We can not block uevent_show() method for that long because udev
> is reading that attribute very often and that blocks udev and interferes
> with booting of the system.
> 
> The change that introduced locking was concerned with dev_uevent()
> racing with unbinding the driver. However we can handle it without
> locking (which will be done in subsequent patch).

So shouldn't we take the second patch first to prevent any issues here?

> There was also claim that synchronization with probe() is needed to
> properly load USB drivers, however this is a red herring: the change
> adding the lock was introduced in May of last year and USB loading and
> probing worked properly for many years before that.
> 
> Revert the harmful locking.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

No Fixes: or cc: stable for this?

thanks,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-20  7:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-20  6:46 [PATCH 1/2] Revert "drivers: core: synchronize really_probe() and dev_uevent()" Dmitry Torokhov
2025-02-20  6:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] driver core: fix potential NULL pointer dereference in dev_uevent() Dmitry Torokhov
2025-02-20 10:59   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-02-25  2:12     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-02-20  7:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2025-02-20  7:22   ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "drivers: core: synchronize really_probe() and dev_uevent()" Dmitry Torokhov
2025-02-25  2:17     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-02-25  6:21       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025022051-happy-plant-b40b@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dirk.behme@de.bosch.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox