The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 02/11] x86/preempt: Move preempt count to percpu hot section
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 14:06:14 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250222190623.262689-3-brgerst@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250222190623.262689-1-brgerst@gmail.com>

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/current.h |  1 -
 arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h | 25 +++++++++++++------------
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c   |  4 +++-
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/current.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/current.h
index bf5953883ec3..9a2fe2fd7d74 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/current.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/current.h
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ struct pcpu_hot {
 	union {
 		struct {
 			struct task_struct	*current_task;
-			int			preempt_count;
 			int			cpu_number;
 #ifdef CONFIG_MITIGATION_CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING
 			u64			call_depth;
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
index 919909d8cb77..2f3a40cbdd76 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -4,10 +4,11 @@
 
 #include <asm/rmwcc.h>
 #include <asm/percpu.h>
-#include <asm/current.h>
 
 #include <linux/static_call_types.h>
 
+DECLARE_PER_CPU_HOT(int, __preempt_count);
+
 /* We use the MSB mostly because its available */
 #define PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED	0x80000000
 
@@ -23,18 +24,18 @@
  */
 static __always_inline int preempt_count(void)
 {
-	return raw_cpu_read_4(pcpu_hot.preempt_count) & ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED;
+	return raw_cpu_read_4(__preempt_count) & ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED;
 }
 
 static __always_inline void preempt_count_set(int pc)
 {
 	int old, new;
 
-	old = raw_cpu_read_4(pcpu_hot.preempt_count);
+	old = raw_cpu_read_4(__preempt_count);
 	do {
 		new = (old & PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED) |
 			(pc & ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED);
-	} while (!raw_cpu_try_cmpxchg_4(pcpu_hot.preempt_count, &old, new));
+	} while (!raw_cpu_try_cmpxchg_4(__preempt_count, &old, new));
 }
 
 /*
@@ -43,7 +44,7 @@ static __always_inline void preempt_count_set(int pc)
 #define init_task_preempt_count(p) do { } while (0)
 
 #define init_idle_preempt_count(p, cpu) do { \
-	per_cpu(pcpu_hot.preempt_count, (cpu)) = PREEMPT_DISABLED; \
+	per_cpu(__preempt_count, (cpu)) = PREEMPT_DISABLED; \
 } while (0)
 
 /*
@@ -57,17 +58,17 @@ static __always_inline void preempt_count_set(int pc)
 
 static __always_inline void set_preempt_need_resched(void)
 {
-	raw_cpu_and_4(pcpu_hot.preempt_count, ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED);
+	raw_cpu_and_4(__preempt_count, ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED);
 }
 
 static __always_inline void clear_preempt_need_resched(void)
 {
-	raw_cpu_or_4(pcpu_hot.preempt_count, PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED);
+	raw_cpu_or_4(__preempt_count, PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED);
 }
 
 static __always_inline bool test_preempt_need_resched(void)
 {
-	return !(raw_cpu_read_4(pcpu_hot.preempt_count) & PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED);
+	return !(raw_cpu_read_4(__preempt_count) & PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -76,12 +77,12 @@ static __always_inline bool test_preempt_need_resched(void)
 
 static __always_inline void __preempt_count_add(int val)
 {
-	raw_cpu_add_4(pcpu_hot.preempt_count, val);
+	raw_cpu_add_4(__preempt_count, val);
 }
 
 static __always_inline void __preempt_count_sub(int val)
 {
-	raw_cpu_add_4(pcpu_hot.preempt_count, -val);
+	raw_cpu_add_4(__preempt_count, -val);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -91,7 +92,7 @@ static __always_inline void __preempt_count_sub(int val)
  */
 static __always_inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
 {
-	return GEN_UNARY_RMWcc("decl", __my_cpu_var(pcpu_hot.preempt_count), e,
+	return GEN_UNARY_RMWcc("decl", __my_cpu_var(__preempt_count), e,
 			       __percpu_arg([var]));
 }
 
@@ -100,7 +101,7 @@ static __always_inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
  */
 static __always_inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
 {
-	return unlikely(raw_cpu_read_4(pcpu_hot.preempt_count) == preempt_offset);
+	return unlikely(raw_cpu_read_4(__preempt_count) == preempt_offset);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPTION
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 8b49b1338f76..519e2ec2027d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -2016,12 +2016,14 @@ __setup("clearcpuid=", setup_clearcpuid);
 
 DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct pcpu_hot, pcpu_hot) = {
 	.current_task	= &init_task,
-	.preempt_count	= INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT,
 	.top_of_stack	= TOP_OF_INIT_STACK,
 };
 EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(pcpu_hot);
 EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(const_pcpu_hot);
 
+DEFINE_PER_CPU_HOT(int, __preempt_count) = INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT;
+EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(__preempt_count);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 static void wrmsrl_cstar(unsigned long val)
 {
-- 
2.48.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-22 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-22 19:06 [RFC PATCH 00/11] Add a percpu subsection for hot data Brian Gerst
2025-02-22 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] percpu: Introduce percpu hot section Brian Gerst
2025-02-22 19:06 ` Brian Gerst [this message]
2025-02-22 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] x86/smp: Move cpu number to " Brian Gerst
2025-02-22 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] x86/retbleed: Move call depth " Brian Gerst
2025-02-22 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] x86/percpu: Move top_of_stack " Brian Gerst
2025-02-22 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] x86/percpu: Move current_task " Brian Gerst
2025-02-22 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] x86/softirq: Move softirq_pending " Brian Gerst
2025-02-22 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] x86/irq: Move irq stacks " Brian Gerst
2025-02-22 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] x86/percpu: Remove pcpu_hot Brian Gerst
2025-02-22 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] x86/stackprotector: Move __stack_chk_guard to percpu hot section Brian Gerst
2025-02-22 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] x86/smp: Move this_cpu_off " Brian Gerst
2025-02-23  9:36 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] Add a percpu subsection for hot data Ingo Molnar
2025-02-23 10:20   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-02-23 10:30     ` Uros Bizjak
2025-02-23 17:25       ` Brian Gerst
2025-02-23 17:30         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-02-23 14:44     ` Brian Gerst
2025-02-23 18:00   ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250222190623.262689-3-brgerst@gmail.com \
    --to=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox