From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 11/11] perf: arm_pmuv3: Add support for the Branch Record Buffer Extension (BRBE)
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:25:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250224122507.GE8144@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250218-arm-brbe-v19-v20-11-4e9922fc2e8e@kernel.org>
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 02:40:06PM -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
>
> From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
[...]
> BRBE records are invalidated whenever events are reconfigured, a new
> task is scheduled in, or after recording is paused (and the records
> have been recorded for the event). The architecture allows branch
> records to be invalidated by the PE under implementation defined
> conditions. It is expected that these conditions are rare.
[...]
> +static void armv8pmu_sched_task(struct perf_event_pmu_context *pmu_ctx, bool sched_in)
> +{
> + struct arm_pmu *armpmu = *this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_armpmu);
> + struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events = this_cpu_ptr(armpmu->hw_events);
> +
> + if (!hw_events->branch_users)
> + return;
> +
> + if (sched_in)
> + brbe_invalidate();
> +}
Just a minor concern. I don't see any handling for task migration.
E.g., for a task is migrated from one CPU to another CPU, I expect we
need to save and restore branch records based on BRBE injection. So
far, the driver simply invalidates all records.
I think this topic is very likely discussed before. If this is the
case, please ignore my comment. Except this, the code looks good
to me.
Thanks,
Leo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-24 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-18 20:39 [PATCH v20 00/11] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-18 20:39 ` [PATCH v20 01/11] perf: arm_pmuv3: Call kvm_vcpu_pmu_resync_el0() before enabling counters Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-18 20:39 ` [PATCH v20 02/11] perf: arm_pmu: Don't disable counter in armpmu_add() Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-18 20:39 ` [PATCH v20 03/11] perf: arm_pmuv3: Don't disable counter in armv8pmu_enable_event() Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-18 20:39 ` [PATCH v20 04/11] perf: arm_v7_pmu: Drop obvious comments for enabling/disabling counters and interrupts Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-18 20:40 ` [PATCH v20 05/11] perf: arm_v7_pmu: Don't disable counter in (armv7|krait_|scorpion_)pmu_enable_event() Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-18 20:40 ` [PATCH v20 06/11] perf: apple_m1: Don't disable counter in m1_pmu_enable_event() Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-18 20:40 ` [PATCH v20 07/11] perf: arm_pmu: Move PMUv3-specific data Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-18 20:40 ` [PATCH v20 08/11] arm64/sysreg: Add BRBE registers and fields Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-18 20:40 ` [PATCH v20 09/11] arm64: Handle BRBE booting requirements Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-18 20:40 ` [PATCH v20 10/11] KVM: arm64: nvhe: Disable branch generation in nVHE guests Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-24 10:41 ` Leo Yan
2025-02-18 20:40 ` [PATCH v20 11/11] perf: arm_pmuv3: Add support for the Branch Record Buffer Extension (BRBE) Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-24 12:25 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2025-02-24 12:46 ` Rob Herring
2025-02-24 14:03 ` Leo Yan
2025-02-24 16:05 ` Mark Rutland
2025-02-24 18:03 ` Leo Yan
2025-02-25 1:31 ` Rob Herring
2025-02-25 12:38 ` Leo Yan
2025-02-25 15:35 ` Rob Herring
2025-02-25 19:46 ` Mark Rutland
2025-02-25 12:01 ` Mark Rutland
2025-02-25 17:48 ` Leo Yan
2025-02-25 19:04 ` Rob Herring
2025-02-25 19:58 ` Mark Rutland
2025-02-26 13:48 ` Leo Yan
2025-02-26 14:26 ` Rob Herring
2025-02-19 16:09 ` [PATCH v20 00/11] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling James Clark
2025-03-01 7:05 ` Will Deacon
2025-03-03 16:44 ` Rob Herring
2025-03-04 11:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-03-04 16:25 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250224122507.GE8144@e132581.arm.com \
--to=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox