public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 12/24] perf/x86/intel: Allocate arch-PEBS buffer and initialize PEBS_BASE MSR
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:18:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250225111805.GL11590@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250218152818.158614-13-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 03:28:06PM +0000, Dapeng Mi wrote:
> Arch-PEBS introduces a new MSR IA32_PEBS_BASE to store the arch-PEBS
> buffer physical address. This patch allocates arch-PEBS buffer and then
> initialize IA32_PEBS_BASE MSR with the buffer physical address.

Not loving how this patch obscures the whole DS area thing and naming.


> @@ -624,13 +604,18 @@ static int alloc_pebs_buffer(int cpu)
>  	int max, node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
>  	void *buffer, *insn_buff, *cea;
>  
> -	if (!x86_pmu.ds_pebs)
> +	if (!intel_pmu_has_pebs())
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	buffer = dsalloc_pages(bsiz, GFP_KERNEL, cpu);
> +	buffer = dsalloc_pages(bsiz, preemptible() ? GFP_KERNEL : GFP_ATOMIC, cpu);

But this plain smells bad, what is this about?

>  	if (unlikely(!buffer))
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	if (x86_pmu.arch_pebs) {
> +		hwev->pebs_vaddr = buffer;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * HSW+ already provides us the eventing ip; no need to allocate this
>  	 * buffer then.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-25 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-18 15:27 [Patch v2 00/24] Arch-PEBS and PMU supports for Clearwater Forest and Panther Lake Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:27 ` [Patch v2 01/24] perf/x86: Add dynamic constraint Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:27 ` [Patch v2 02/24] perf/x86/intel: Add Panther Lake support Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:27 ` [Patch v2 03/24] perf/x86/intel: Add PMU support for Clearwater Forest Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:27 ` [Patch v2 04/24] perf/x86/intel: Parse CPUID archPerfmonExt leaves for non-hybrid CPUs Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:27 ` [Patch v2 05/24] perf/x86/intel: Decouple BTS initialization from PEBS initialization Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 06/24] perf/x86/intel: Rename x86_pmu.pebs to x86_pmu.ds_pebs Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 07/24] perf/x86/intel: Introduce pairs of PEBS static calls Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 08/24] perf/x86/intel: Initialize architectural PEBS Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 09/24] perf/x86/intel/ds: Factor out common PEBS processing code to functions Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 10/24] perf/x86/intel: Process arch-PEBS records or record fragments Dapeng Mi
2025-02-25 10:39   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-25 11:00     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-26  5:20       ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-26  9:35         ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-26 15:45           ` Liang, Kan
2025-02-27  2:04             ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-25 20:42     ` Andi Kleen
2025-02-26  2:54     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 11/24] perf/x86/intel: Factor out common functions to process PEBS groups Dapeng Mi
2025-02-25 11:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-26  5:24     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 12/24] perf/x86/intel: Allocate arch-PEBS buffer and initialize PEBS_BASE MSR Dapeng Mi
2025-02-25 11:18   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-02-26  5:48     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-26  9:46       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-27  2:05         ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-25 11:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-26  6:19     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-26  9:48       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-27  2:09         ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 13/24] perf/x86/intel: Update dyn_constranit base on PEBS event precise level Dapeng Mi
2025-02-27 14:06   ` Liang, Kan
2025-03-05  1:41     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 14/24] perf/x86/intel: Setup PEBS data configuration and enable legacy groups Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 15/24] perf/x86/intel: Add SSP register support for arch-PEBS Dapeng Mi
2025-02-25 11:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-26  6:56     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-25 11:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-25 20:44     ` Andi Kleen
2025-02-27  6:29       ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 16/24] perf/x86/intel: Add counter group " Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 17/24] perf/core: Support to capture higher width vector registers Dapeng Mi
2025-02-25 20:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-26  7:55     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 18/24] perf/x86/intel: Support arch-PEBS vector registers group capturing Dapeng Mi
2025-02-25 15:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-26  8:08     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-27  6:40       ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-03-04  3:08         ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-03-04 16:26           ` Liang, Kan
2025-03-05  1:34             ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 19/24] perf tools: Support to show SSP register Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 20/24] perf tools: Enhance arch__intr/user_reg_mask() helpers Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 21/24] perf tools: Enhance sample_regs_user/intr to capture more registers Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 22/24] perf tools: Support to capture more vector registers (x86/Intel) Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 23/24] perf tools/tests: Add vector registers PEBS sampling test Dapeng Mi
2025-02-18 15:28 ` [Patch v2 24/24] perf tools: Fix incorrect --user-regs comments Dapeng Mi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250225111805.GL11590@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox