From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ftrace: Check against is_kernel_text() instead of kaslr_offset()
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:20:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250225182054.471759017@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20250225182004.473875894@goodmis.org
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
As kaslr_offset() is architecture dependent and also may not be defined by
all architectures, when zeroing out unused weak functions, do not check
against kaslr_offset(), but instead check if the address is within the
kernel text sections. If KASLR added a shift to the zeroed out function,
it would still not be located in the kernel text. This is a more robust
way to test if the text is valid or not.
Fixes: ef378c3b8233 ("scripts/sorttable: Zero out weak functions in mcount_loc table")
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250224180805.GA1536711@ax162/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/5225b07b-a9b2-4558-9d5f-aa60b19f6317@sirena.org.uk/
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 183f72cf15ed..bec7b5dbdb3b 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -7004,7 +7004,6 @@ static int ftrace_process_locs(struct module *mod,
unsigned long count;
unsigned long *p;
unsigned long addr;
- unsigned long kaslr;
unsigned long flags = 0; /* Shut up gcc */
unsigned long pages;
int ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -7056,9 +7055,6 @@ static int ftrace_process_locs(struct module *mod,
ftrace_pages->next = start_pg;
}
- /* For zeroed locations that were shifted for core kernel */
- kaslr = !mod ? kaslr_offset() : 0;
-
p = start;
pg = start_pg;
while (p < end) {
@@ -7072,7 +7068,18 @@ static int ftrace_process_locs(struct module *mod,
* object files to satisfy alignments.
* Skip any NULL pointers.
*/
- if (!addr || addr == kaslr) {
+ if (!addr) {
+ skipped++;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If this is core kernel, make sure the address is in core
+ * or inittext, as weak functions get zeroed and KASLR can
+ * move them to something other than zero. It just will not
+ * move it to an area where kernel text is.
+ */
+ if (!mod && !(is_kernel_text(addr) || is_kernel_inittext(addr))) {
skipped++;
continue;
}
--
2.47.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-25 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-25 18:20 [PATCH 0/4] scripts/sorttable: ftrace: Fix some bugs with sorttable and ARM 64 Steven Rostedt
2025-02-25 18:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] ftrace: Test mcount_loc addr before calling ftrace_call_addr() Steven Rostedt
2025-02-25 18:20 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2025-02-25 18:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] scripts/sorttable: Use normal sort if theres no relocs in the mcount section Steven Rostedt
2025-02-25 18:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] scripts/sorttable: Allow matches to functions before function entry Steven Rostedt
2025-02-25 18:35 ` [PATCH 0/4] scripts/sorttable: ftrace: Fix some bugs with sorttable and ARM 64 Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250225182054.471759017@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox