From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] task_work: Consume only item at a time while invoking the callbacks.
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:29:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250226142914.GF8995@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250226141601.VBQ91ZDb@linutronix.de>
On 02/26, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> On 2025-02-23 23:40:15 [+0100], Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Well... I won't really argue because I can't suggest a better fix at
> > least right now. Most probably never.
> >
> > However, let me say that this patch doesn't make me happy ;) See below.
> >
> > On 02/21, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > >
> > > Oleg pointed out that this might be problematic if one closes 2.000.000
> > > files at once. While testing this scenario by opening that many files
> > > following by exit() to ensure that all files are closed at once, I did
> > > not observe anything outside of noise.
> >
> > and this probably means that we can revert c82199061009 ("task_work: remove
> > fifo ordering guarantee") and restore the fifo ordering which IMO makes much
> > more sense.
>
> So assume that turning around will fix the problem because the cancel
> callback is run first followed by the clean up.
Not really, they can run in any order, so fifo can't really help.
But this doesn't matter, please see another email:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250226125048.GC8995@redhat.com/
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-26 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-21 17:05 [PATCH] task_work: Consume only item at a time while invoking the callbacks Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-23 22:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-25 14:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-02-25 16:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-25 22:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-02-26 13:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-26 14:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-26 14:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-02-26 18:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-26 14:16 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-26 14:29 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2025-02-26 14:32 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-26 12:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-26 13:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250226142914.GF8995@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox