From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Alejandro Jimenez <alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com>, joro@8bytes.org
Cc: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>,
dheerajkumar.srivastava@amd.com, sarunkod@amd.com,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, will@kernel.org,
joao.m.martins@oracle.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/amd: Preserve default DTE fields when updating Host Page Table Root
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 12:35:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250226163502.GC28425@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3ed5d5e-4b9d-445e-8d2b-3b315322ff2e@oracle.com>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 11:19:46AM -0500, Alejandro Jimenez wrote:
> On 1/7/25 13:01, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 05:45:38PM +0530, Vasant Hegde wrote:
> > > > @@ -2052,12 +2052,12 @@ static void set_dte_entry(struct amd_iommu *iommu,
> > > > make_clear_dte(dev_data, dte, &new);
> > >
> > > This fix is fine. But with all changes we have done in this code does, do we
> > > really need make_clear_dte()?
> >
> > > How about removing `make_clear_dte()` and moving DTE_FLAG_V to
> > > write_dte_lower128() ?
> >
> > The V flag should just be set by the functions building the DTE,
> > write_dte_lower() should accept a fully formed dte as a matter of
> > layering.
> >
> > I'm hopefull Suravee will come with something like this:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20241016142237.GP3559746@nvidia.com/
> >
>
> Suravee did say he would implement the suggestions above in the series for
> nested translation support, but that might take a while considering where
> we are in the cycle. Given that this fix is straightforward and has been
> reviewed by Dheeraj, are there any concerns with merging it in its current
> form?
+1 to take the fix
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-26 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-06 19:14 [PATCH 1/1] iommu/amd: Preserve default DTE fields when updating Host Page Table Root Alejandro Jimenez
2025-01-07 8:50 ` Srivastava, Dheeraj Kumar
2025-01-07 12:15 ` Vasant Hegde
2025-01-07 13:36 ` Arun Kodilkar, Sairaj
2025-01-07 18:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-26 16:19 ` Alejandro Jimenez
2025-02-26 16:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-02-28 9:54 ` Vasant Hegde
2025-02-28 11:18 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250226163502.GC28425@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=dheerajkumar.srivastava@amd.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sarunkod@amd.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox