From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2541D25B698 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 09:26:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740734808; cv=none; b=h7G57nKG9LnWaqTsDsKnJ0ykvMrlvNVk37OSAtydR6jkrdUnfytbuZc/lTZhZ/kIhksVk6iu+q7U6z7lfF3YPTuUY9NXC9uEdX3IJ/9eyPsYNxZ7vl4bLvLQ71HsWWAUznqmJfMftNFSGZF8YvKsWiu2DYSkupc7tVqyElte6wY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740734808; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LItF/BusLrrc26OL+BucHV4iN652H8zo9JOygXcgBaY=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Lvzt1Ru0RA8WqSPIaJgAIXcorWv+/YVIrtAkx/nACM7V6jUMYyiAgBW1id6TGON9V1lKvLJqv2At3u03Ktsa5fa8SKA3TP+y7ofNBmKGHNIYWpH2JrNW882Q/7zaypyypDqRxOGB5Gq/TsApNsKIshnffbQKL/LVbS/bk5UA4QU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Z42p23K4sz6M4dp; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:23:54 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D26EF140A34; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:26:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.96.237.92) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:26:40 +0100 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:26:35 +0800 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab CC: Igor Mammedov , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Shiju Jose , , , Ani Sinha , Dongjiu Geng , Peter Maydell , "Shannon Zhao" , Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/19] acpi/ghes: prepare to change the way HEST offsets are calculated Message-ID: <20250228172635.000027c4@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500009.china.huawei.com (7.191.174.84) To frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:00:43 +0100 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Add a new ags flag to change the way HEST offsets are calculated. > Currently, offsets needed to store ACPI HEST offsets and read ack > are calculated based on a previous knowledge from the logic > which creates the HEST table. > > Such logic is not generic, not allowing to easily add more HEST > entries nor replicates what OSPM does. > > As the next patches will be adding a more generic logic, add a > new use_hest_addr, set to false, in preparation for such changes. > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab LGTM Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron