From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] f2fs: do sanity check on xattr node footer in f2fs_get_xnode_page()
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 11:54:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250303035423.1357211-2-chao@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250303035423.1357211-1-chao@kernel.org>
This patch introduces a new wrapper f2fs_get_xnode_page(), then, caller
can use it to load xattr block to page cache, meanwhile it will do sanity
check on xattr node footer.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
fs/f2fs/node.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
fs/f2fs/node.h | 1 +
fs/f2fs/xattr.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index 74a80bb06f06..38016d24e59c 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -3704,6 +3704,7 @@ void f2fs_ra_node_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid);
struct page *f2fs_get_node_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, pgoff_t nid);
struct folio *f2fs_get_inode_folio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, pgoff_t ino);
struct page *f2fs_get_inode_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, pgoff_t ino);
+struct page *f2fs_get_xnode_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, pgoff_t xnid);
struct page *f2fs_get_node_page_ra(struct page *parent, int start);
int f2fs_move_node_page(struct page *node_page, int gc_type);
void f2fs_flush_inline_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index ee5daa6f7408..5be8badc6261 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1245,7 +1245,7 @@ int f2fs_truncate_xattr_node(struct inode *inode)
if (!nid)
return 0;
- npage = f2fs_get_node_page(sbi, nid);
+ npage = f2fs_get_xnode_page(sbi, nid);
if (IS_ERR(npage))
return PTR_ERR(npage);
@@ -1461,7 +1461,9 @@ static int sanity_check_node_footer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
enum node_type ntype)
{
if (unlikely(nid != nid_of_node(page) ||
- (ntype == NODE_TYPE_INODE && !IS_INODE(page)))) {
+ (ntype == NODE_TYPE_INODE && !IS_INODE(page)) ||
+ (ntype == NODE_TYPE_XATTR &&
+ !f2fs_has_xattr_block(ofs_of_node(page))))) {
f2fs_warn(sbi, "inconsistent node block, node_type:%d, nid:%lu, "
"node_footer[nid:%u,ino:%u,ofs:%u,cpver:%llu,blkaddr:%u]",
ntype, nid, nid_of_node(page), ino_of_node(page),
@@ -1551,6 +1553,14 @@ struct page *f2fs_get_inode_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, pgoff_t ino)
return &folio->page;
}
+struct page *f2fs_get_xnode_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, pgoff_t xnid)
+{
+ struct folio *folio = __get_node_folio(sbi, xnid, NULL, 0,
+ NODE_TYPE_XATTR);
+
+ return &folio->page;
+}
+
struct page *f2fs_get_node_page_ra(struct page *parent, int start)
{
struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_P_SB(parent);
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.h b/fs/f2fs/node.h
index 5079c6a2298d..103a437e6425 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.h
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ enum {
enum node_type {
NODE_TYPE_REGULAR,
NODE_TYPE_INODE,
+ NODE_TYPE_XATTR,
};
/*
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/xattr.c b/fs/f2fs/xattr.c
index d5b42e1005d8..c691b35618ad 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/xattr.c
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ static int read_xattr_block(struct inode *inode, void *txattr_addr)
void *xattr_addr;
/* The inode already has an extended attribute block. */
- xpage = f2fs_get_node_page(sbi, xnid);
+ xpage = f2fs_get_xnode_page(sbi, xnid);
if (IS_ERR(xpage))
return PTR_ERR(xpage);
@@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ static inline int write_all_xattrs(struct inode *inode, __u32 hsize,
/* write to xattr node block */
if (F2FS_I(inode)->i_xattr_nid) {
- xpage = f2fs_get_node_page(sbi, F2FS_I(inode)->i_xattr_nid);
+ xpage = f2fs_get_xnode_page(sbi, F2FS_I(inode)->i_xattr_nid);
if (IS_ERR(xpage)) {
err = PTR_ERR(xpage);
f2fs_alloc_nid_failed(sbi, new_nid);
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-03 3:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-03 3:54 [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: do sanity check on inode footer in f2fs_get_inode_page() Chao Yu
2025-03-03 3:54 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2025-03-03 3:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: introduce FAULT_INCONSISTENT_FOOTER Chao Yu
2025-03-04 17:10 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: do sanity check on inode footer in f2fs_get_inode_page() patchwork-bot+f2fs
2025-03-05 6:39 ` Zhiguo Niu
2025-03-05 8:27 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250303035423.1357211-2-chao@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox