From: "Michał Pecio" <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Cc: ki.chiang65@gmail.com, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH] xhci: Handle spurious events on Etron host isoc enpoints
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 11:34:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250303113401.280cb911@foxbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250228161824.3164826-1-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:18:24 +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> Unplugging a USB3.0 webcam from Etron hosts while streaming results
> in errors like this:
>
> [ 2.646387] xhci_hcd 0000:03:00.0: ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr
> not part of current TD ep_index 18 comp_code 13 [ 2.646446] xhci_hcd
> 0000:03:00.0: Looking for event-dma 000000002fdf8630 trb-start
> 000000002fdf8640 trb-end 000000002fdf8650 [ 2.646560] xhci_hcd
> 0000:03:00.0: ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr not part of current TD
> ep_index 18 comp_code 13 [ 2.646568] xhci_hcd 0000:03:00.0: Looking
> for event-dma 000000002fdf8660 trb-start 000000002fdf8670 trb-end
> 000000002fdf8670
>
> Etron xHC generates two transfer events for the TRB if an error is
> detected while processing the last TRB of an isoc TD.
>
> The first event can be any sort of error (like USB Transaction or
> Babble Detected, etc), and the final event is Success.
>
> The xHCI driver will handle the TD after the first event and remove it
> from its internal list, and then print an "Transfer event TRB DMA ptr
> not part of current TD" error message after the final event.
>
> Commit 5372c65e1311 ("xhci: process isoc TD properly when there was a
> transaction error mid TD.") is designed to address isoc transaction
> errors, but unfortunately it doesn't account for this scenario.
>
> This issue is similar to the XHCI_SPURIOUS_SUCCESS case where a
> success event follows a 'short transfer' event, but the TD the event
> points to is already given back.
>
> Expand the spurious success 'short transfer' event handling to cover
> the spurious success after error on Etron hosts.
>
> Kuangyi Chiang reported this issue and submitted a different solution
> based on using error_mid_td. This commit message is mostly taken
> from that patch.
>
> Reported-by: Kuangyi Chiang <ki.chiang65@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Works here too, modulo the obvious build problem.
Etron with errors:
[ 1064.865311] xhci_hcd 0000:06:00.0: Transfer error for slot 1 ep 2 on endpoint
[ 1064.865322] xhci_hcd 0000:06:00.0: Successful completion on short TX for slot 1 ep 2 with last td comp code 4
[ 1064.865326] xhci_hcd 0000:06:00.0: Spurious event dma 0x00000000ffef88c0, comp_code 13 after 4
Renesas with short packets:
[ 1365.299218] xhci_hcd 0000:08:00.0: Successful completion on short TX for slot 1 ep 2 with last td comp code 13
[ 1365.299223] xhci_hcd 0000:08:00.0: Spurious event dma 0x00000000ffbbf870, comp_code 13 after 13
BTW, it says "comp_code 13 after something" because of this crazy
TRUST_TX_LENGTH hack, which changes trb_comp_code if it's success
but the residual is nonzero. If I remove the hack,
Etron:
[ 2713.630443] xhci_hcd 0000:06:00.0: Spurious event dma 0x00000000ff3b6130, comp_code 1 after 4
Renesas:
[ 4033.652300] xhci_hcd 0000:08:00.0: Spurious event dma 0x00000000ffcd1b80, comp_code 1 after 13
The hack could almost be removed now, but if there really are HCs
which report Success on the first event, this won't work for them:
> +static bool xhci_spurious_success_tx_event(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
> + struct xhci_ring *ring)
> +{
> + switch (ring->old_trb_comp_code) {
> + case COMP_SHORT_PACKET:
> + return xhci->quirks & XHCI_SPURIOUS_SUCCESS;
Could it work without relying on fictional COMP_SHORT_PACKET events?
> + if (xhci_spurious_success_tx_event(xhci, ep_ring)) {
> + xhci_dbg(xhci, "Spurious event dma %pad, comp_code %u after %u\n",
> + &ep_trb_dma, trb_comp_code, ep_ring->old_trb_comp_code);
> + ep_ring->old_trb_comp_code = trb_comp_code;
This part will (quite arbitrarily IMO) not execute if td_list is empty.
I had this idea that "empty td_list" and "no matching TD on td_list"
are practically identical cases, and their code could be merged.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-03 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 5:37 [PATCH v4 0/1] xhci: Some improvement for Etron xHCI host Kuangyi Chiang
2025-02-05 5:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/1] xhci: Correctly handle last TRB of isoc TD on " Kuangyi Chiang
2025-02-05 14:17 ` Mathias Nyman
2025-02-05 15:17 ` Mathias Nyman
2025-02-07 1:38 ` Kuangyi Chiang
2025-02-10 6:09 ` Kuangyi Chiang
2025-02-05 22:42 ` Michał Pecio
2025-02-07 12:06 ` Mathias Nyman
2025-02-10 8:57 ` Michał Pecio
2025-02-11 12:36 ` [PATCH] usb: xhci: Handle quirky SuperSpeed isoc error reporting by Etron HCs Michal Pecio
2025-02-12 5:59 ` Kuangyi Chiang
2025-02-12 8:12 ` Michał Pecio
2025-02-28 16:13 ` Mathias Nyman
2025-02-28 16:18 ` [RFT PATCH] xhci: Handle spurious events on Etron host isoc enpoints Mathias Nyman
2025-02-28 19:57 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-28 20:07 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-01 2:05 ` Kuangyi Chiang
2025-03-03 3:29 ` Kuangyi Chiang
2025-03-03 8:28 ` Mathias Nyman
2025-03-03 10:34 ` Michał Pecio [this message]
2025-03-03 15:08 ` Mathias Nyman
2025-03-06 8:50 ` Michał Pecio
2025-02-28 17:11 ` [PATCH] usb: xhci: Handle quirky SuperSpeed isoc error reporting by Etron HCs Michał Pecio
2025-02-28 17:14 ` Michał Pecio
2025-02-07 1:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/1] xhci: Correctly handle last TRB of isoc TD on Etron xHCI host Kuangyi Chiang
2025-02-05 21:45 ` Michał Pecio
2025-02-07 6:59 ` Kuangyi Chiang
2025-02-07 9:51 ` Michał Pecio
2025-02-10 6:18 ` Kuangyi Chiang
2025-03-17 10:12 ` [PATCH v4 0/1] xhci: Some improvement for " Michał Pecio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250303113401.280cb911@foxbook \
--to=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ki.chiang65@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox