From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74FDD1F12E7 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2025 23:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=150.107.74.76 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741043645; cv=none; b=o2q+ZMKj7bF/wu0b4SW7PXRMNxrnh4uxeLpXZWvCosI+rBgEbKCu3SV+jGr2x1rYjY0M7zL/QQn0cW7qj26OP5Wt/TvMJefQrdCMp9tYUdFk24sS8kw6qjdxGrMB7dWWAzHqZEXse0IHFcFtw/+o9SyReAjAENAZHRJyhxCFSn0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741043645; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ksQKGGa9kQgqkg5ODjySLSS1WpbS/XcqzJBdz1UwtRU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kBAaeqL7n+bWrsT9451JdfYyRrjKnJixPuVv2+fqrwGT3W5rStWbVFq6qamdL9dYN8MI6r+wIrPiZ4Rq34oTQg1qCxqv1ZCnXfT8ODJdZp0UXXuPkENAYHVjyWmG14enODRCTG+5H67rSj/uPOKnRHsez1jcZrxB+72IAP5LYGI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=canb.auug.org.au; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b=qA7uTYMk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=150.107.74.76 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="qA7uTYMk" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1741043640; bh=c06IwIafGujtJ/Kas9O7TJpHAAgll/CuyLRgEjfHugs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qA7uTYMkLIPYFCo8o3p8HzFqNGRJGG1rFKmM49NfYb7DWkTXM8xBReM0JY9FaDWHM Dvm40Q6hRt2obXuQ4ROPplCnfmCnRudSrqqWm8AmGrLfdzWRYeyBcRsXGwYXmO0No9 mQ3Dt5v5NlGcQb+JwMyjbFgbWPdfTSJyOKe3M8AVaIK5sJAbGjujzY3uIoOjNH2j4x JO8n0bWgcDeZhZzEM9okQjPCJIwbOmvvY5yzxVRYHUy0BSfY8ylbeEhPv5+RF9xzl9 H8CeJ4dlxabFB4oRQ7UJYcQspw7rTFzAoT/uoxz20oBnHpcLYJKv6fkVLRgRoy+Ez0 wneFlgpE7IZWg== Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Z6F4Q3RBzz4x3S; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 10:13:58 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 10:13:57 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Johannes Weiner , kernel test robot , Brendan Jackman , Andrew Morton , David Hildenbrand , Oscar Salvador , llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Memory Management List , Vlastimil Babka , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Add lockdep assertion for pageblock type change Message-ID: <20250304101357.66067dd3@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: <20250227-pageblock-lockdep-v1-1-3701efb331bb@google.com> <202503010129.rJvGqZN1-lkp@intel.com> <20250228182804.GB120597@cmpxchg.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/ZeuLQSGosGcBcpXwHeZ1evo"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 --Sig_/ZeuLQSGosGcBcpXwHeZ1evo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andy, On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 13:18:42 +0200 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 01:28:04PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 01:31:30AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: =20 >=20 > > The patch is missing a dummy in_mem_hotplug() in the > > !CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG section of . =20 >=20 > +1, I just stumbled over and this is not fixed in today's Linux Next. I'm > wondering how this was missed during merge into Linux Next. Stephen? I just get what people put in their trees. There are no conflicts around this and none of my builds failed, so I didn't see the problem. Has someone sent a fix patch to Andrew? If so, if you forward it to me, I will add it to linux-next today. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/ZeuLQSGosGcBcpXwHeZ1evo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmfGN7UACgkQAVBC80lX 0Gx9MQf+MIPUXZ445QXq8nD8kEGdAATVDoiwm2KZJnqzIHW6/h7P81s60M1tl97F qyQWDc2auW3QKvim2HiMionWAZ8paCV7538ZeXtUOa0oiLffZYhUutci0QjLN9wh qgyxpW+tfdGolwstw/xSqaOh2SRyBe9FpqnBJ6JOKeGtVGfLBfWu3dNWs3ktHddr vZZKm6mI58JzkRbp70YvkWY9aSQGUFo3zx3GzhaIyPWg5QgvWH/IZl+JjtRMrQ+B smEDQHhBcvANUzEjbWJzkQrsEQYdhuvjx/Xe14XTibwC1aNPH79FrcIqtN54aC0V 11+SnhPHeTwb4hUUzBZ6eypNlaNk8Q== =C4Si -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ZeuLQSGosGcBcpXwHeZ1evo--