public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: juri.lelli@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sshegde@linux.ibm.com, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	vschneid@redhat.com, hbathini@linux.ibm.com,
	joelagnelf@nvidia.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] sched: issues with sched_rt_runtime_us
Date: Thu,  6 Mar 2025 10:59:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250306052954.452005-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

ftrace selftest reported below failure in one of the systems.
[5] Test tracefs GID mount option       [FAIL]

On inspection this happens since writing -1 to sched_rt_runtime_us 
fails. This happened because the possible cpus were more than the 
active cpus. 

Fix this issue by considering only the online CPUs for validating the 
deadline entities. This is minimal impact compared to changing the 
dl_bw_cpus use possible mask. If that is better, we can follow that
approach. 

There is also another issue that is observed when working on it. Writing
any value less than 5% of period results in -EBUSY. This happens since 
fair_server dl_server allocates 5% of the bandwidth and that is part of
the bandwidth of the root domain. Lets document that behaviour since
the file allows writing -1 as the minimum. 

Shrikanth Hegde (2):
  sched/deadline: use online cpus for validating runtime
  sched/rt: update limit of sched_rt sysctl in documentation

 Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.rst | 3 +++
 kernel/sched/deadline.c                    | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.39.3


             reply	other threads:[~2025-03-06  5:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-06  5:29 Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2025-03-06  5:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: use online cpus for validating runtime Shrikanth Hegde
2025-03-06  8:29   ` Juri Lelli
2025-03-06 10:02   ` [tip: sched/urgent] sched/deadline: Use " tip-bot2 for Shrikanth Hegde
2025-03-06  5:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/rt: update limit of sched_rt sysctl in documentation Shrikanth Hegde
2025-03-06  8:34   ` Juri Lelli
2025-03-06 10:02   ` [tip: sched/urgent] sched/rt: Update " tip-bot2 for Shrikanth Hegde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250306052954.452005-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox