From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E424E1805A; Sun, 9 Mar 2025 14:32:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741530729; cv=none; b=OiZKP/TOYRHraSx7HHB591OH3qikWErULBNUUEGlbWiwsrsgRU0YNjwZuNbwLCnW9ILpsXhUHV1OJeTk6ufg6RQAo3BSSr67ErJTIxQ5zPlBXGJ4E7rJYPjfW2ZpIhMdF4cW5uSZxDkyg4NVqx3N6wvxeHqpNfAPijsnfT95QYo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741530729; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ti2DMm80WbUBc2ExKC60hjSqeSo8ZUKPZArTIBKllvM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pMsaVkOMT/tM2RUsa7lQd5jmE/ywJB2ZiKRzVZEVQPURax26865KnJWPzlIQ+mxoqdYvAXNrgycviQn6xacB5i3m30fXdR8bXtVp4yzE2B6tsl4IDGJcbmuT/Ga4vo7GxwghtE/sGQ+sTReyefqYEsj+0+P1CQbvwaLj9PGqC0M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=jHjvrWCX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="jHjvrWCX" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1741530728; x=1773066728; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Ti2DMm80WbUBc2ExKC60hjSqeSo8ZUKPZArTIBKllvM=; b=jHjvrWCX7YZcP8qK22L9nMqPgT01dmelLG5sbI8cXdPlVuQDVW56XTfO T1r9FrsA6PYAAo0L2Q8hwgP4QfQUZ2Vke4gsT5ygtTMc6+T7O0VMW6ILE RpRsO1kuWwI/oCBI4JZRRrRc4uI2P+Yib6VTDJQUigTS5WH+hrcMczYgY z39FdBrv+0mKrcKQrFczUryKV7vZl1cg0fADEi2Au0pIH3BFKmazsjHJU uR49OC9aWil+ee26XpXrLkbyn0WYg6wA2thvfWFSmz86lAYvqTl0kKbRq Tt22ebZ3TcbQSs+7TjHu2UV+BAhDN4WZOUeImDyCuht1q9w9cCrH1QoVm A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: PxQ9WBlmTM++MXuCi+HSqw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: cdeqYLIbRRqL4diCajqp6A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11368"; a="59938760" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,234,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="59938760" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Mar 2025 07:32:07 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XYtqj3AOTVOMo3vKUN0AcQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RTmPoT6TTX68oHd4+7DbeA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,224,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="123947083" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO a4747d147074) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2025 07:32:04 -0700 Received: from kbuild by a4747d147074 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1trHhC-0003BO-0O; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 14:32:02 +0000 Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 22:31:38 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Wen Yang , Christian Brauner , Jan Kara , Alexander Viro Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Wen Yang , Jens Axboe , Dylan Yudaken , David Woodhouse , Paolo Bonzini , Dave Young , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] eventfd: introduce configurable maximum value for eventfd Message-ID: <202503092223.G4FJDVsM-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250309055003.32194-1-wen.yang@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250309055003.32194-1-wen.yang@linux.dev> Hi Wen, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on brauner-vfs/vfs.all] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.14-rc5 next-20250307] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wen-Yang/eventfd-introduce-configurable-maximum-value-for-eventfd/20250309-135152 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git vfs.all patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250309055003.32194-1-wen.yang%40linux.dev patch subject: [PATCH v3] eventfd: introduce configurable maximum value for eventfd config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-003-20250309 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250309/202503092223.G4FJDVsM-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-12) 11.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250309/202503092223.G4FJDVsM-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503092223.G4FJDVsM-lkp@intel.com/ All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): fs/eventfd.c: In function 'eventfd_is_writable': >> fs/eventfd.c:251:76: error: 'ucnt' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'uint'? 251 | return (ctx->maximum > ctx->count) && (ctx->maximum - ctx->count > ucnt); | ^~~~ | uint fs/eventfd.c:251:76: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in >> fs/eventfd.c:252:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] 252 | } | ^ vim +251 fs/eventfd.c 248 249 static inline bool eventfd_is_writable(const struct eventfd_ctx *ctx) 250 { > 251 return (ctx->maximum > ctx->count) && (ctx->maximum - ctx->count > ucnt); > 252 } 253 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki