Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] perf: Rename perf_event_exit_task(.child)

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 04:38:36PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> On 08-Mar-25 1:03 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > The task passed to perf_event_exit_task() is not a child, it is
> > current. Fix this confusing naming, since much of the rest of the code
> > also relies on it being current.
> > 
> > Specifically, both exec() and exit() callers use it with current as
> > the argument.
> 
> ...
> 
> > -static void perf_event_exit_task_context(struct task_struct *child, bool exit)
> > +static void perf_event_exit_task_context(struct task_struct *task, bool exit)
> >  {
> > -	struct perf_event_context *child_ctx, *clone_ctx = NULL;
> > +	struct perf_event_context *ctx, *clone_ctx = NULL;
> >  	struct perf_event *child_event, *next;
> >  
> > -	WARN_ON_ONCE(child != current);
> > +	WARN_ON_ONCE(task != current);
> 
> exec() codepath (i.e. copy_process()) passes child pointer, not 'current'.

I am confused, this not a new warning. Also, copy_process() is clone(),
exec() is another code path.