From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] libapi: Add missing header with NAME_MAX define to io_dir.h
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:45:31 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250310194534.265487-2-acme@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250310194534.265487-1-acme@kernel.org>
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Most systems get this indirectly, but some odd cases (some musl libc
systems) can't find it, so just add the header where NAME_MAX is defined
to avoid that.
Fixes: d118b08f7eee6d6f ("tools lib api: Add io_dir an allocation free readdir alternative")
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
tools/lib/api/io_dir.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/tools/lib/api/io_dir.h b/tools/lib/api/io_dir.h
index aab73393d2a217ab..ef83e967e48c59f7 100644
--- a/tools/lib/api/io_dir.h
+++ b/tools/lib/api/io_dir.h
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
+#include <linux/limits.h>
#if !defined(SYS_getdents64)
#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__arm__)
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-10 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-10 19:45 [PATCH 0/3] Some build fixes Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-03-10 19:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2025-03-10 19:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf units: Fix insufficient array space Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-03-10 19:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf hist stdio: Do bounds check when printing callchains to avoid UB with new gcc versions Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-03-10 21:55 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-03-13 7:29 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-03-13 16:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] Some build fixes Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250310194534.265487-2-acme@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox