public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: lcherian@marvell.com, coresight@lists.linaro.org,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] coresight: Add claim tag warnings and debug messages
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 14:40:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250313144005.GQ9682@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250211103945.967495-5-james.clark@linaro.org>

On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:39:40AM +0000, James Clark wrote:
> 
> Add a dev_dbg() message so that external debugger conflicts are more
> visible. There are multiple reasons for -EBUSY so a message for this
> particular one could be helpful. Add errors for and enumerate all the
> other cases that are impossible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c | 48 ++++++++++++--------
>  drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-priv.h |  5 +-
>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> index 7b53165c93af..7fe5d5d432c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> @@ -133,16 +133,6 @@ static inline u32 coresight_read_claim_tags(struct csdev_access *csa)
>                          csdev_access_relaxed_read32(csa, CORESIGHT_CLAIMCLR));
>  }
> 
> -static inline bool coresight_is_claimed_self_hosted(struct csdev_access *csa)
> -{
> -       return coresight_read_claim_tags(csa) == CORESIGHT_CLAIM_SELF_HOSTED;
> -}
> -
> -static inline bool coresight_is_claimed_any(struct coresight_device *csdev)
> -{
> -       return coresight_read_claim_tags(&csdev->access) != 0;
> -}
> -
>  static inline void coresight_set_self_claim_tag(struct csdev_access *csa)
>  {
>         csdev_access_relaxed_write32(csa, CORESIGHT_CLAIM_SELF_HOSTED,
> @@ -169,18 +159,40 @@ static inline void coresight_clear_self_claim_tag(struct csdev_access *csa)
>   */
>  int coresight_claim_device_unlocked(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>  {
> +       int tag;
> +       struct csdev_access *csa;
> +
>         if (WARN_ON(!csdev))
>                 return -EINVAL;
> 
> -       if (coresight_is_claimed_any(csdev))
> +       csa = &csdev->access;
> +       tag = coresight_read_claim_tags(csa);
> +
> +       switch (tag) {
> +       case CORESIGHT_CLAIM_FREE:
> +               coresight_set_self_claim_tag(csa);
> +               if (coresight_read_claim_tags(csa) == CORESIGHT_CLAIM_SELF_HOSTED)
> +                       return 0;
> +

It would be a rare case if a failure happens here.  Seems to me, it
would be valuable to print a log for this edge case.

Otherwise, looks good to me.

> +               /* There was a race setting the tag, clean up and fail */
> +               coresight_clear_self_claim_tag(csa);
>                 return -EBUSY;
> 
> -       coresight_set_self_claim_tag(&csdev->access);
> -       if (coresight_is_claimed_self_hosted(&csdev->access))
> -               return 0;
> -       /* There was a race setting the tag, clean up and fail */
> -       coresight_clear_self_claim_tag(&csdev->access);
> -       return -EBUSY;
> +       case CORESIGHT_CLAIM_EXTERNAL:
> +               /* External debug is an expected state, so log and report BUSY */
> +               dev_dbg(&csdev->dev, "Busy: Claimed by external debugger");
> +               return -EBUSY;
> +
> +       default:
> +       case CORESIGHT_CLAIM_SELF_HOSTED:
> +       case CORESIGHT_CLAIM_INVALID:
> +               /*
> +                * Warn here because we clear a lingering self hosted tag
> +                * on probe, so other tag combinations are impossible.
> +                */
> +               dev_err_once(&csdev->dev, "Invalid claim tag state: %x", tag);
> +               return -EBUSY;
> +       }
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(coresight_claim_device_unlocked);
> 
> @@ -205,7 +217,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(coresight_claim_device);
>   */
>  void coresight_disclaim_device_unlocked(struct csdev_access *csa)
>  {
> -       if (coresight_is_claimed_self_hosted(csa))
> +       if (coresight_read_claim_tags(csa) == CORESIGHT_CLAIM_SELF_HOSTED)
>                 coresight_clear_self_claim_tag(csa);
>         else
>                 /*
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-priv.h b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-priv.h
> index cc7ff1e36ef4..a83113225797 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-priv.h
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-priv.h
> @@ -36,7 +36,10 @@ extern const struct device_type coresight_dev_type[];
>   * See PSCI - ARM DEN 0022D, Section: 6.8.1 Debug and Trace save and restore.
>   */
>  #define CORESIGHT_CLAIM_MASK           GENMASK(1, 0)
> -#define CORESIGHT_CLAIM_SELF_HOSTED    BIT(1)
> +#define CORESIGHT_CLAIM_FREE           0
> +#define CORESIGHT_CLAIM_EXTERNAL       1
> +#define CORESIGHT_CLAIM_SELF_HOSTED    2
> +#define CORESIGHT_CLAIM_INVALID                3
> 
>  #define TIMEOUT_US             100
>  #define BMVAL(val, lsb, msb)   ((val & GENMASK(msb, lsb)) >> lsb)
> --
> 2.34.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CoreSight mailing list -- coresight@lists.linaro.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to coresight-leave@lists.linaro.org

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-13 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-11 10:39 [PATCH 0/7] coresight: Clear self hosted claim tag on probe James Clark
2025-02-11 10:39 ` [PATCH 1/7] coresight: Rename coresight_{set,clear}_claim_tags() James Clark
2025-03-13 11:24   ` Leo Yan
2025-02-11 10:39 ` [PATCH 2/7] coresight: Convert disclaim functions to take a struct cs_access James Clark
2025-03-13 14:54   ` Leo Yan
2025-03-17 11:36     ` James Clark
2025-03-17 18:29       ` Leo Yan
2025-03-18  9:27         ` James Clark
2025-02-11 10:39 ` [PATCH 3/7] coresight: Only check bottom two claim bits James Clark
2025-03-13 11:46   ` Leo Yan
2025-02-11 10:39 ` [PATCH 4/7] coresight: Add claim tag warnings and debug messages James Clark
2025-03-13 14:40   ` Leo Yan [this message]
2025-03-17 11:56     ` James Clark
2025-02-11 10:39 ` [PATCH 5/7] coresight: Clear self hosted claim tag on probe James Clark
2025-02-12 18:24   ` Mike Leach
2025-02-13 13:20     ` James Clark
2025-03-13 16:04   ` Leo Yan
2025-03-17 15:05     ` James Clark
2025-03-17 18:09       ` Leo Yan
2025-02-11 10:39 ` [PATCH 6/7] coresight: Remove inlines from static function definitions James Clark
2025-03-14  9:50   ` Leo Yan
2025-03-17 15:26     ` James Clark
2025-03-17 17:45       ` Leo Yan
2025-02-11 10:39 ` [PATCH 7/7] coresight: Remove extern from function declarations James Clark
2025-03-13 16:17   ` Leo Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250313144005.GQ9682@e132581.arm.com \
    --to=leo.yan@arm.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox