From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172])
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B2B2686AD
	for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 14:55:02 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1741877704; cv=none; b=SyG73ZoIQrBzcRniyYHgk7JENPx4otjiuH82je04o8zEDOzY6WsGBLpp5G4RgOHpxcc8X70t8XUYdfvWhRcOglojR92yv22OL0NrQldBIB3e/o4OK1h8WActnMOYcC5vUUq/hPzIkyUdqwUW+OcsuYuUBIXQf3xjIlErhEBuesk=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1741877704; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=Y/jMw/T2ECIkUtNYZ6DZyaIiiEl5KUsCLGEvvoCpf6w=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
	 Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HFsFUR9dUGUJcJMzy5trlEYyf5WdTz7SzXKsYXOfB7CuQZw8p/mEpdPi0HCRT3+ypyw83mCTRnM5La0LuNG0ZxUU5ME+4KU6a9Igey3VqS1MpceNSfXSYkpQyC4DtpZNr06P6Pdl7ZYJ58u29wBf6ItfUhSWqpIp6PLhjEVZa00=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com
Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14])
	by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CFD01516;
	Thu, 13 Mar 2025 07:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (e132581.arm.com [10.1.196.87])
	by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C8E63F694;
	Thu, 13 Mar 2025 07:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 14:54:56 +0000
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: lcherian@marvell.com, coresight@lists.linaro.org,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] coresight: Convert disclaim functions to take a
 struct cs_access
Message-ID: <20250313145456.GR9682@e132581.arm.com>
References: <20250211103945.967495-1-james.clark@linaro.org>
 <20250211103945.967495-3-james.clark@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20250211103945.967495-3-james.clark@linaro.org>

On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:39:38AM +0000, James Clark wrote:

[...]

>  static inline bool coresight_is_claimed_any(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>  {
> -       return coresight_read_claim_tags(csdev) != 0;
> +       return coresight_read_claim_tags(&csdev->access) != 0;
>  }

Likewise other claim functions, can coresight_is_claimed_any() change its
argument type from struct coresight_device to struct csdev_access?

Thanks,
Leo