From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
To: "A. Sverdlin" <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "bus: ti-sysc: Probe for l4_wkup and l4_cfg interconnect devices first"
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 20:21:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250313202129.0dcfc44e@akair> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250313094708.1003092-1-alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
Hi Alexander,
Am Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:47:06 +0100
schrieb "A. Sverdlin" <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>:
> From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
>
> This reverts commit 4700a00755fb5a4bb5109128297d6fd2d1272ee6.
>
> It brakes target-module@2b300050 ("ti,sysc-omap2") probe on AM62x in a case
> when minimally-configured system tries to network-boot:
>
brakes or breaks? To unterstand the severity of the issue...
> [ 6.888776] probe of 2b300050.target-module returned 517 after 258 usecs
> [ 17.129637] probe of 2b300050.target-module returned 517 after 708 usecs
> [ 17.137397] platform 2b300050.target-module: deferred probe pending: (reason unknown)
> [ 26.878471] Waiting up to 100 more seconds for network.
>
> Arbitrary 10 deferrals is really not a solution to any problem.
So there is a point where no more probe of anything pending are
triggered and therefore things are not probed?
> Stable mmc enumeration can be achiever by filling /aliases node properly
> (4700a00755fb commit's rationale).
>
yes, it does not look like a clean solution. And we have the
proper aliases node in many places. What I am a bit wondering about is
what kind of sleeping dogs we are going to wake up by this revert. So I
think this should be tested a lot esp. about possible pm issues.
Not every dependency in the sysc probe area is properly defined.
Regards,
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-13 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-13 9:47 [PATCH] Revert "bus: ti-sysc: Probe for l4_wkup and l4_cfg interconnect devices first" A. Sverdlin
2025-03-13 19:21 ` Andreas Kemnade [this message]
2025-03-13 20:42 ` Sverdlin, Alexander
2025-03-13 22:01 ` Andreas Kemnade
2025-03-19 3:56 ` Tony Lindgren
2025-03-19 6:54 ` Sverdlin, Alexander
2025-03-19 7:18 ` Sverdlin, Alexander
2025-03-19 7:39 ` Sverdlin, Alexander
2025-03-20 4:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2025-03-19 8:17 ` Andreas Kemnade
2025-03-20 4:09 ` Tony Lindgren
2025-03-31 9:00 ` Andreas Kemnade
2025-04-01 3:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2025-04-01 7:06 ` Sverdlin, Alexander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250313202129.0dcfc44e@akair \
--to=andreas@kemnade.info \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rogerq@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox