From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] sched_ext: idle: Explicitly pass allowed cpumask to scx_select_cpu_dfl()
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 10:45:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250314094827.167563-5-arighi@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250314094827.167563-1-arighi@nvidia.com>
Modify scx_select_cpu_dfl() to take the allowed cpumask as an explicit
argument, instead of implicitly using @p->cpus_ptr.
This prepares for future changes where arbitrary cpumasks may be passed
to the built-in idle CPU selection policy.
This is a pure refactoring with no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
---
kernel/sched/ext.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/ext_idle.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
kernel/sched/ext_idle.h | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 06561d6717c9a..f42352e8d889e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -3395,7 +3395,7 @@ static int select_task_rq_scx(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int wake_flag
} else {
s32 cpu;
- cpu = scx_select_cpu_dfl(p, prev_cpu, wake_flags, 0);
+ cpu = scx_select_cpu_dfl(p, prev_cpu, wake_flags, p->cpus_ptr, 0);
if (cpu >= 0) {
p->scx.slice = SCX_SLICE_DFL;
p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id = SCX_DSQ_LOCAL;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
index 1940baedde157..27aaadf14cb44 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
@@ -430,7 +430,8 @@ void scx_idle_update_selcpu_topology(struct sched_ext_ops *ops)
* NOTE: tasks that can only run on 1 CPU are excluded by this logic, because
* we never call ops.select_cpu() for them, see select_task_rq().
*/
-s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64 flags)
+s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags,
+ const struct cpumask *cpus_allowed, u64 flags)
{
struct cpumask *llc_cpus = NULL, *numa_cpus = NULL;
int node = scx_cpu_node_if_enabled(prev_cpu);
@@ -448,12 +449,12 @@ s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64
if (static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_NUMA, &scx_selcpu_topo_numa)) {
struct cpumask *cpus = numa_span(prev_cpu);
- if (cpus && !cpumask_equal(cpus, p->cpus_ptr)) {
- if (cpumask_subset(cpus, p->cpus_ptr)) {
+ if (cpus && !cpumask_equal(cpus, cpus_allowed)) {
+ if (cpumask_subset(cpus, cpus_allowed)) {
numa_cpus = cpus;
} else {
numa_cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(local_numa_idle_cpumask);
- if (!cpumask_and(numa_cpus, cpus, p->cpus_ptr))
+ if (!cpumask_and(numa_cpus, cpus, cpus_allowed))
numa_cpus = NULL;
}
}
@@ -461,12 +462,12 @@ s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64
if (static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_SCHED_MC, &scx_selcpu_topo_llc)) {
struct cpumask *cpus = llc_span(prev_cpu);
- if (cpus && !cpumask_equal(cpus, p->cpus_ptr)) {
- if (cpumask_subset(cpus, p->cpus_ptr)) {
+ if (cpus && !cpumask_equal(cpus, cpus_allowed)) {
+ if (cpumask_subset(cpus, cpus_allowed)) {
llc_cpus = cpus;
} else {
llc_cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(local_llc_idle_cpumask);
- if (!cpumask_and(llc_cpus, cpus, p->cpus_ptr))
+ if (!cpumask_and(llc_cpus, cpus, cpus_allowed))
llc_cpus = NULL;
}
}
@@ -507,7 +508,7 @@ s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64
cpu_rq(cpu)->scx.local_dsq.nr == 0 &&
(!(flags & SCX_PICK_IDLE_IN_NODE) || (waker_node == node)) &&
!cpumask_empty(idle_cpumask(waker_node)->cpu)) {
- if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
+ if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpus_allowed))
goto out_unlock;
}
}
@@ -552,7 +553,7 @@ s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64
* begin in prev_cpu's node and proceed to other nodes in
* order of increasing distance.
*/
- cpu = scx_pick_idle_cpu(p->cpus_ptr, node, flags | SCX_PICK_IDLE_CORE);
+ cpu = scx_pick_idle_cpu(cpus_allowed, node, flags | SCX_PICK_IDLE_CORE);
if (cpu >= 0)
goto out_unlock;
@@ -600,7 +601,7 @@ s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64
* in prev_cpu's node and proceed to other nodes in order of
* increasing distance.
*/
- cpu = scx_pick_idle_cpu(p->cpus_ptr, node, flags);
+ cpu = scx_pick_idle_cpu(cpus_allowed, node, flags);
if (cpu >= 0)
goto out_unlock;
@@ -856,7 +857,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc s32 scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu,
goto prev_cpu;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- cpu = scx_select_cpu_dfl(p, prev_cpu, wake_flags, 0);
+ cpu = scx_select_cpu_dfl(p, prev_cpu, wake_flags, p->cpus_ptr, 0);
if (cpu >= 0) {
*is_idle = true;
return cpu;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.h b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.h
index 511cc2221f7a8..37be78a7502b3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.h
@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ static inline s32 scx_pick_idle_cpu(const struct cpumask *cpus_allowed, int node
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
-s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64 flags);
+s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags,
+ const struct cpumask *cpus_allowed, u64 flags);
void scx_idle_enable(struct sched_ext_ops *ops);
void scx_idle_disable(void);
int scx_idle_init(void);
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-14 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-14 9:45 [PATCHSET v3 sched_ext/for-6.15] sched_ext: Enhance built-in idle selection with allowed CPUs Andrea Righi
2025-03-14 9:45 ` [PATCH 1/8] sched_ext: idle: Honor idle flags in the built-in idle selection policy Andrea Righi
2025-03-14 9:45 ` [PATCH 2/8] sched_ext: idle: Refactor scx_select_cpu_dfl() Andrea Righi
2025-03-14 18:17 ` Tejun Heo
2025-03-14 9:45 ` [PATCH 3/8] sched_ext: idle: Extend topology optimizations to all tasks Andrea Righi
2025-03-14 18:21 ` Tejun Heo
2025-03-14 20:05 ` Andrea Righi
2025-03-14 9:45 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2025-03-14 9:45 ` [PATCH 5/8] sched_ext: idle: Accept an arbitrary cpumask in scx_select_cpu_dfl() Andrea Righi
2025-03-14 9:45 ` [PATCH 6/8] sched_ext: idle: Introduce scx_bpf_select_cpu_and() Andrea Righi
2025-03-15 1:35 ` Changwoo Min
2025-03-15 9:08 ` Andrea Righi
2025-03-14 9:45 ` [PATCH 7/8] selftests/sched_ext: Add test for scx_bpf_select_cpu_and() Andrea Righi
2025-03-14 9:45 ` [PATCH 8/8] sched_ext: idle: Deprecate scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl() Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250314094827.167563-5-arighi@nvidia.com \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox