public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
To: xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, jakub@cloudflare.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
	eddyz87@gmail.com, mykolal@fb.com, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
	haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
	mhal@rbox.co, jiayuan.chen@linux.dev, sgarzare@redhat.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+dd90a702f518e0eac072@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/3] bpf, sockmap: avoid using sk_socket after free when reading
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:22:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250317092257.68760-3-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250317092257.68760-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>

There are potential concurrency issues, as shown below.
'''
CPU0                               CPU1
sk_psock_verdict_data_ready:
  socket *sock = sk->sk_socket
  if (!sock) return
                                   close(fd):
                                     ...
                                     ops->release()
  if (!sock->ops) return
                                     sock->ops = NULL
                                     rcu_call(sock)
                                     free(sock)
  READ_ONCE(sock->ops)
  ^
  use 'sock' after free
'''

RCU is not applicable to Unix sockets read path, because the Unix socket
implementation itself assumes it's always in process context and heavily
uses mutex_lock, so, we can't call read_skb within rcu lock.

Incrementing the psock reference count would not help either, since
sock_map_close() does not wait for data_ready() to complete its execution.

While we don't utilize sk_socket here, implementing read_skb at the sock
layer instead of socket layer might be architecturally preferable ?
However, deferring this optimization as current fix adequately addresses
the immediate issue.

Fixes: c63829182c37 ("af_unix: Implement ->psock_update_sk_prot()")
Reported-by: syzbot+dd90a702f518e0eac072@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/6734c033.050a0220.2a2fcc.0015.GAE@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
---
 net/core/skmsg.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
index 6101c1bb279a..5e913b62929e 100644
--- a/net/core/skmsg.c
+++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
@@ -1231,17 +1231,24 @@ static int sk_psock_verdict_recv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 
 static void sk_psock_verdict_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
 {
-	struct socket *sock = sk->sk_socket;
+	struct socket *sock;
 	const struct proto_ops *ops;
 	int copied;
 
 	trace_sk_data_ready(sk);
 
-	if (unlikely(!sock))
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	sock = sk->sk_socket;
+	if (unlikely(!sock)) {
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 		return;
+	}
 	ops = READ_ONCE(sock->ops);
-	if (!ops || !ops->read_skb)
+	if (!ops || !ops->read_skb) {
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 		return;
+	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	copied = ops->read_skb(sk, sk_psock_verdict_recv);
 	if (copied >= 0) {
 		struct sk_psock *psock;
-- 
2.47.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-17  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-17  9:22 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] bpf: Fix use-after-free of sockmap Jiayuan Chen
2025-03-17  9:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/3] bpf, sockmap: avoid using sk_socket after free when sending Jiayuan Chen
2025-03-19 23:02   ` Cong Wang
2025-03-19 23:36     ` Jiayuan Chen
2025-03-20  0:06       ` Cong Wang
2025-03-20  0:27         ` Jiayuan Chen
2025-03-20 12:32   ` Michal Luczaj
2025-03-20 14:48     ` Jiayuan Chen
2025-03-17  9:22 ` Jiayuan Chen [this message]
2025-03-20  0:34   ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/3] bpf, sockmap: avoid using sk_socket after free when reading Cong Wang
2025-03-20 12:36     ` Jiayuan Chen
2025-03-17  9:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add edge case tests for sockmap Jiayuan Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250317092257.68760-3-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
    --to=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mhal@rbox.co \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+dd90a702f518e0eac072@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox