Re: [RFC PATCH] initramfs: Add size validation to prevent tmpfs exhaustion

Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-18T19:01:32Z

On 18/03/2025 13:46, Stephen Eta Zhou wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof
>
>> Just in case before anyone tries to actually apply it: the entire patch
>> has both corrupted header and actual patch is corrupted - all
>> indentation messed.
>
> Sorry, this is my oversight.....
> I checked it locally using checkpatch.pl and it was fine, but I just used it to import and found that there is a problem. Sorry for wasting your time. I will regenerate this patch and resend it in the correct format.
>
> Krzysztof, thanks for pointing this out.
>
> Thanks,
> Stephen
> ________________________________________
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 19:55
> To: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>; Stephen Eta Zhou <stephen.eta.zhou@outlook.com>
> Cc: jsperbeck@google.com <jsperbeck@google.com>; akpm@linux-foundation.org <akpm@linux-foundation.org>; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>; lukas@wunner.de <lukas@wunner.de>; wufan@linux.microsoft.com <wufan@linux.microsoft.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] initramfs: Add size validation to prevent tmpfs exhaustion
>
What is this header doing this? Use standard mailing list response
style, not some copy-paste and then quote entire irrelevant context.

Best regards,
Krzysztof