public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Karunika Choo <karunika.choo@arm.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nd@arm.com,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] drm/panthor: Add 64-bit and poll register accessors
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 08:48:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250321084809.5f217049@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250320111741.1937892-2-karunika.choo@arm.com>

On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 11:17:33 +0000
Karunika Choo <karunika.choo@arm.com> wrote:

> This patch adds 64-bit register accessors to simplify register access in
> Panthor. It also adds 32-bit and 64-bit variants for read_poll_timeout.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Karunika Choo <karunika.choo@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_regs.h | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_regs.h
> index 42dc3fedb0d4..7ec4a1d04e20 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_regs.h
> @@ -238,4 +238,59 @@
>  #define gpu_read(dev, reg) \
>  	readl((dev)->iomem + (reg))
>  
> +#define gpu_read_relaxed(dev, reg) readl_relaxed((dev)->iomem + (reg))
> +
> +#define gpu_write64(dev, reg, data)                            \
> +	do {                                                   \
> +		u64 __val = (u64)(data);                       \
> +		gpu_write(dev, reg, lower_32_bits(__val));     \
> +		gpu_write(dev, reg + 4, upper_32_bits(__val)); \
> +	} while (0)

We're not doing funky name concatenation in these macros, so I'd rather
have them defined as static inline funcs in panthor_device.h. We
probably want to move the gpu_read/write definitions there as well if
we do that.

> +
> +#define gpu_read64(dev, reg) \
> +	(gpu_read(dev, reg) | ((u64)gpu_read(dev, reg + 4) << 32))
> +
> +#define gpu_read64_relaxed(dev, reg)  \
> +	(gpu_read_relaxed(dev, reg) | \
> +	 ((u64)gpu_read_relaxed(dev, reg + 4) << 32))
> +
> +#define gpu_read64_sync(dev, reg)                     \
> +	({                                            \
> +		u32 lo, hi1, hi2;                     \
> +		do {                                  \
> +			hi1 = gpu_read(dev, reg + 4); \
> +			lo = gpu_read(dev, reg);      \
> +			hi2 = gpu_read(dev, reg + 4); \
> +		} while (hi1 != hi2);                 \
> +		lo | ((u64)hi2 << 32);                \
> +	})

I would name that one gpu_read64_counter and make it a static inline
function. Note that we already have panthor_gpu_read_64bit_counter()
which does the same thing, so maybe move it there and rename it along
the way.

> +
> +#define gpu_read_poll_timeout(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us)    \
> +	read_poll_timeout(gpu_read, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us, false, \
> +			  dev, reg)
> +
> +#define gpu_read_poll_timeout_atomic(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us,         \
> +				     timeout_us)                            \
> +	read_poll_timeout_atomic(gpu_read, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us, \
> +				 false, dev, reg)
> +
> +#define gpu_read64_poll_timeout(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us)    \
> +	read_poll_timeout(gpu_read64, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us, false, \
> +			  dev, reg)
> +
> +#define gpu_read64_poll_timeout_atomic(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us,         \
> +				       timeout_us)                            \
> +	read_poll_timeout_atomic(gpu_read64, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us, \
> +				 false, dev, reg)
> +
> +#define gpu_read_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, \
> +					     timeout_us)                    \
> +	read_poll_timeout_atomic(gpu_read_relaxed, val, cond, delay_us,     \
> +				 timeout_us, false, dev, reg)
> +
> +#define gpu_read64_relaxed_poll_timeout(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us,         \
> +					timeout_us)                            \
> +	read_poll_timeout(gpu_read64_relaxed, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us, \
> +			  false, dev, reg)
> +
>  #endif


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-21  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-20 11:17 [PATCH v2 0/9] drm/panthor: Add GPU specific initialization framework to support new Mali GPUs Karunika Choo
2025-03-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] drm/panthor: Add 64-bit and poll register accessors Karunika Choo
2025-03-21  7:48   ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2025-04-09 13:00     ` Karunika Choo
2025-04-10 13:28       ` Boris Brezillon
2025-04-10 16:49         ` Karunika Choo
2025-03-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/panthor: Use " Karunika Choo
2025-03-21  7:53   ` Boris Brezillon
2025-04-09 13:07     ` Karunika Choo
2025-04-10 13:29       ` Boris Brezillon
2025-03-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/panthor: Add GPU specific initialization framework Karunika Choo
2025-03-21  8:28   ` Boris Brezillon
2025-03-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/panthor: Move GPU info initialization into panthor_hw.c Karunika Choo
2025-03-21  8:16   ` Boris Brezillon
2025-03-21  8:43     ` Boris Brezillon
2025-03-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/panthor: Make getting GPU model name simple and extensible Karunika Choo
2025-03-21  8:02   ` Boris Brezillon
2025-04-10 13:20     ` Karunika Choo
2025-04-10 13:37       ` Boris Brezillon
2025-03-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/panthor: Add support for Mali-G715 family of GPUs Karunika Choo
2025-03-21  8:34   ` Boris Brezillon
2025-03-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] drm/panthor: Support GPU_CONTROL cache flush based on feature bit Karunika Choo
2025-03-21  8:41   ` Boris Brezillon
2025-03-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] drm/panthor: Add support for Mali-G720 and Mali-G725 GPUs Karunika Choo
2025-03-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] drm/panthor: Add support for Mali-G710, Mali-G510, and Mali-G310 Karunika Choo
2025-03-20 19:03   ` Liviu Dudau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250321084809.5f217049@collabora.com \
    --to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=karunika.choo@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox