From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Karunika Choo <karunika.choo@arm.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nd@arm.com,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/panthor: Make getting GPU model name simple and extensible
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 09:02:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250321090254.667a86cb@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250320111741.1937892-6-karunika.choo@arm.com>
On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 11:17:37 +0000
Karunika Choo <karunika.choo@arm.com> wrote:
> This patch replaces the previous panthor_model structure with a simple
> switch case based on the product_id, which is in the format of:
> ((arch_major << 24) | product_major)
>
> This not only simplifies the comparison, but also allows extending the
> function to accommodate naming differences based on GPU features.
>
> Signed-off-by: Karunika Choo <karunika.choo@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_hw.c | 63 +++++++-------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_regs.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_hw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_hw.c
> index 4cc4b0d5382c..12183c04cd21 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_hw.c
> @@ -5,40 +5,6 @@
> #include "panthor_hw.h"
> #include "panthor_regs.h"
>
> -/**
> - * struct panthor_model - GPU model description
> - */
> -struct panthor_model {
> - /** @name: Model name. */
> - const char *name;
> -
> - /** @arch_major: Major version number of architecture. */
> - u8 arch_major;
> -
> - /** @product_major: Major version number of product. */
> - u8 product_major;
> -};
> -
> -/**
> - * GPU_MODEL() - Define a GPU model. A GPU product can be uniquely identified
> - * by a combination of the major architecture version and the major product
> - * version.
> - * @_name: Name for the GPU model.
> - * @_arch_major: Architecture major.
> - * @_product_major: Product major.
> - */
> -#define GPU_MODEL(_name, _arch_major, _product_major) \
> -{\
> - .name = __stringify(_name), \
> - .arch_major = _arch_major, \
> - .product_major = _product_major, \
> -}
> -
> -static const struct panthor_model gpu_models[] = {
> - GPU_MODEL(g610, 10, 7),
> - {},
> -};
> -
> static void arch_10_8_gpu_info_init(struct panthor_device *ptdev)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> @@ -66,29 +32,34 @@ static void arch_10_8_gpu_info_init(struct panthor_device *ptdev)
> ptdev->gpu_info.l2_present = gpu_read64(ptdev, GPU_L2_PRESENT_LO);
> }
>
> +static char *get_gpu_model_name(struct panthor_device *ptdev)
> +{
> + const u32 gpu_id = ptdev->gpu_info.gpu_id;
> + const u32 product_id = GPU_PROD_ID_MAKE(GPU_ARCH_MAJOR(gpu_id),
> + GPU_PROD_MAJOR(gpu_id));
> +
> + switch (product_id) {
> + case GPU_PROD_ID_MAKE(10, 7):
> + return "Mali-G610";
> + }
I a big fan of these ever growing switch statements with nested
conditionals. Could we instead add an optional ::get_variant() callback
in panthor_model and have the following formatting:
"Mali-%s%s%s", model->name,
model->get_variant ? "-" : "",
model->get_variant ? model->get_variant() : ""
> +
> + return "(Unknown Mali GPU)";
> +}
> +
> static void panthor_gpu_init_info(struct panthor_device *ptdev)
> {
> - const struct panthor_model *model;
> - u32 arch_major, product_major;
> + const char *gpu_model_name = get_gpu_model_name(ptdev);
> u32 major, minor, status;
>
> ptdev->hw->ops.gpu_info_init(ptdev);
>
> - arch_major = GPU_ARCH_MAJOR(ptdev->gpu_info.gpu_id);
> - product_major = GPU_PROD_MAJOR(ptdev->gpu_info.gpu_id);
> major = GPU_VER_MAJOR(ptdev->gpu_info.gpu_id);
> minor = GPU_VER_MINOR(ptdev->gpu_info.gpu_id);
> status = GPU_VER_STATUS(ptdev->gpu_info.gpu_id);
>
> - for (model = gpu_models; model->name; model++) {
> - if (model->arch_major == arch_major &&
> - model->product_major == product_major)
> - break;
> - }
> -
> drm_info(&ptdev->base,
> - "mali-%s id 0x%x major 0x%x minor 0x%x status 0x%x",
> - model->name ?: "unknown", ptdev->gpu_info.gpu_id >> 16,
> + "%s id 0x%x major 0x%x minor 0x%x status 0x%x",
> + gpu_model_name, ptdev->gpu_info.gpu_id >> 16,
> major, minor, status);
>
> drm_info(&ptdev->base,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_regs.h
> index ba452c1dd644..d9e0769d6f1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_regs.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #define GPU_VER_STATUS(x) ((x) & GENMASK(3, 0))
>
> #define GPU_ARCH_ID_MAKE(major, minor, rev) (((major) << 16) | ((minor) << 8) | (rev))
> +#define GPU_PROD_ID_MAKE(arch_major, prod_major) (((arch_major) << 24) | (prod_major))
>
> #define GPU_L2_FEATURES 0x4
> #define GPU_L2_FEATURES_LINE_SIZE(x) (1 << ((x) & GENMASK(7, 0)))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-21 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-20 11:17 [PATCH v2 0/9] drm/panthor: Add GPU specific initialization framework to support new Mali GPUs Karunika Choo
2025-03-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] drm/panthor: Add 64-bit and poll register accessors Karunika Choo
2025-03-21 7:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-04-09 13:00 ` Karunika Choo
2025-04-10 13:28 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-04-10 16:49 ` Karunika Choo
2025-03-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/panthor: Use " Karunika Choo
2025-03-21 7:53 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-04-09 13:07 ` Karunika Choo
2025-04-10 13:29 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-03-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/panthor: Add GPU specific initialization framework Karunika Choo
2025-03-21 8:28 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-03-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/panthor: Move GPU info initialization into panthor_hw.c Karunika Choo
2025-03-21 8:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-03-21 8:43 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-03-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/panthor: Make getting GPU model name simple and extensible Karunika Choo
2025-03-21 8:02 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2025-04-10 13:20 ` Karunika Choo
2025-04-10 13:37 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-03-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/panthor: Add support for Mali-G715 family of GPUs Karunika Choo
2025-03-21 8:34 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-03-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] drm/panthor: Support GPU_CONTROL cache flush based on feature bit Karunika Choo
2025-03-21 8:41 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-03-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] drm/panthor: Add support for Mali-G720 and Mali-G725 GPUs Karunika Choo
2025-03-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] drm/panthor: Add support for Mali-G710, Mali-G510, and Mali-G310 Karunika Choo
2025-03-20 19:03 ` Liviu Dudau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250321090254.667a86cb@collabora.com \
--to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=karunika.choo@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox