linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH next 0/3] iov: Optimise user copies
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 22:45:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250321224557.3847-1-david.laight.linux@gmail.com> (raw)

The speculation barrier in access_ok() is expensive.

The first patch removes the initial checks when reading the iovec[].
The checks are repeated before the actual copy.

The second patch uses 'user address masking' if supported.

The third removes a lot of code for single entry iovec[].

David Laight (3):
  Remove access_ok() from import_iovec()
  Use masked user accesses
  Optimise __import_iovec_ubuf()

 lib/iov_iter.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

-- 
2.39.5


             reply	other threads:[~2025-03-21 22:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-21 22:45 David Laight [this message]
2025-03-21 22:45 ` [PATCH next 1/3] iov: Remove access_ok() from import_iovec() David Laight
2025-03-21 22:45 ` [PATCH next 2/3] iov: Use masked user accesses David Laight
2025-03-21 22:45 ` [PATCH next 3/3] iov: Optimise __import_iovec_ubuf() David Laight
2025-03-21 23:35 ` [PATCH next 0/3] iov: Optimise user copies Linus Torvalds
2025-03-22 10:08   ` David Laight
2025-03-22 22:37   ` David Laight
2025-03-29 11:31   ` David Laight
2025-03-22 14:36 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250321224557.3847-1-david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).