From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftests: vDSO: chacha: Provide default definition of HWCAP_S390_VXRS
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 16:55:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250324155513.12139G44-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250324-s390-vdso-hwcap-v1-3-cb9ad001ceba@linutronix.de>
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 03:03:17PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> s390 does not provide a hwcap.h UAPI header.
>
> Add an inline definition for the constant HWCAP_S390_VXRS until a proper
> UAPI header is introduced.
>
> Fixes: 210860e7f733 ("selftests: vDSO: check cpu caps before running chacha test")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_chacha.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_chacha.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_chacha.c
> index fd5c5108b42f04ec459d39b74f33edc2ceafbba1..0ce5189718ce35b0a4d69b71559db8379b598b93 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_chacha.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_chacha.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,9 @@ static bool cpu_has_capabilities(void)
> return getauxval(AT_HWCAP) & HWCAP_ASIMD;
> }
> #elif defined(__s390x__)
> +#ifndef HWCAP_S390_VXRS
> +#define HWCAP_S390_VXRS (1 << 11)
> +#endif
> static bool cpu_has_capabilities(void)
> {
> return getauxval(AT_HWCAP) & HWCAP_S390_VXRS;
How did this cause a problem?
Did you use something different than glibc(-devel) on your test
system? Just wondering since glibc-devel provides the define since
ages and is also required for getauxval().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-24 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-24 14:03 [PATCH 0/3] selftests: vDSO: chacha: Bugfixes Thomas Weißschuh
2025-03-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftests: vDSO: chacha: Correctly skip test if necessary Thomas Weißschuh
2025-03-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] selftests: vDSO: chacha: Include asm/hwcap.h for arm64 Thomas Weißschuh
2025-03-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftests: vDSO: chacha: Provide default definition of HWCAP_S390_VXRS Thomas Weißschuh
2025-03-24 15:55 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2025-03-25 6:48 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-03-25 7:18 ` Heiko Carstens
2025-03-25 10:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250324155513.12139G44-hca@linux.ibm.com \
--to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox