From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Noah Wang <noahwang.wang@outlook.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: trivial-devices: Document SPI measurement on LWE boards
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:46:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250326-bulge-outdated-9787da68e2d3@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250326184240.77e2bdc9@wsk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2666 bytes --]
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 06:42:40PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Conor,
>
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 03:09:30PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > > The measurement device on Liebherr's (LWE) boards is used to monitor
> > > the overall state of the device. It does have SPI interface to
> > > communicate with Linux host via spidev driver. Document the SPI DT
> > > binding as trivial SPI device.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
> > > ---
> >
> > You should not do a resend with no explanation as to why.
> > Additionally, I would like to know why my review on the original
> > patch was ignored:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250225-despair-rural-dc10216005f4@spud/#t
> >
>
> I've made a mistake, as I've used the lwe prefix, which is the
> different branch office for Liebherr.
>
> As we discussed last time - it would be better to use the already
> present 'lwn' vendor prefix as several other boards from this company
> use it (display5, bk4, xea, btt3).
>
> And this was apparent, after I've resent the patches. My mistake.
>
> Regarding the comment - on xea, btt the binding would be used, as those
> two boards (based on imx287) are using it.
>
> Hence, single "trivial device" would be OK.
>
> The v2 of this patch has the proper 'lwn,btt' binding.
I'm sorry, I don't understand how this excuses using the same binding
for different devices.
>
> > Cheers,
> > Conor.
> >
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml | 2 ++
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml index
> > > fadbd3c041c8..5d736a9792c2 100644 ---
> > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml +++
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml @@ -161,6
> > > +161,8 @@ properties:
> > > - jedec,spd5118
> > > # Linear Technology LTC2488
> > > - lineartechnology,ltc2488
> > > + # Liebherr on-board measurement SPI device
> > > + - lwe,btt
> > > # 5 Bit Programmable, Pulse-Width Modulator
> > > - maxim,ds1050
> > > # 10 kOhm digital potentiometer with I2C interface
> > > --
> > > 2.39.5
> > >
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lukasz Majewski
>
> --
>
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@denx.de
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-26 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-26 14:09 [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: trivial-devices: Document SPI measurement on LWE boards Lukasz Majewski
2025-03-26 16:43 ` Conor Dooley
2025-03-26 17:42 ` Lukasz Majewski
2025-03-26 17:46 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2025-03-26 21:27 ` Lukasz Majewski
2025-03-26 22:12 ` Conor Dooley
2025-03-26 17:18 ` [PATCH v2] " Lukasz Majewski
2025-03-26 17:30 ` Fabio Estevam
2025-03-26 17:38 ` Lukasz Majewski
2025-03-26 18:12 ` Conor Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250326-bulge-outdated-9787da68e2d3@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lukma@denx.de \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=noahwang.wang@outlook.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox