From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
To: Anusha Srivatsa <asrivats@redhat.com>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm/panel: Add refcount support
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 10:23:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250326102304.49510630@booty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250325-b4-panel-refcounting-v1-2-4e2bf5d19c5d@redhat.com>
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 13:24:09 -0400
Anusha Srivatsa <asrivats@redhat.com> wrote:
> Allocate panel via reference counting.
> Add _get() and _put() helper functions
> to ensure panel allocations are refcounted.
> Avoid use after free by ensuring panel is
> valid and can be usable till the last reference
> is put. This avoids use-after-free
"panel is valid and can be usable" is not totally correct. When there
are still references held, you ensure the panel struct is still
_allocated_, not necessarily valid and usable.
Minor nit: you are wrapping at less than 50 columns, which is a bit
tight. I think 75 is the expected value for wrapping.
> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <asrivats@redhat.com>
[...]
> +/**
> + * drm_panel_get - Acquire a panel reference
> + * @panel: DRM panel
> + *
> + * This function increments the panel's refcount.
> + *
> + */
Not sure it's mandatory, but documenting the returned value is good
practice , e.g.:
* Returns:
* Pointer to @panel.
> +/**
> + * drm_panel_put - Release a panel reference
> + * @panel: DRM panel
> + *
> + * This function decrements the panel's reference count and frees the
> + * object if the reference count drops to zero.
> + */
> +struct drm_panel *drm_panel_put(struct drm_panel *panel)
> +{
> + if (!panel)
> + return panel;
> +
> + kref_put(&panel->refcount, __drm_panel_free);
> +
> + return panel;
While this is using the same structure as my bridge work, I now realize
the _put() should probably not return the panel (or bridge) pointer, it
should just be a void function. The reason is the pointer might have
been freed when _put() returns (depending on the refcount) so that
pointer value might be dangling and whoever calls _put() must not use
that pointer anymore.
Other get/put APIs do this, e.g. of_node_get/put().
So I'm going to change drm_bridge_put() to return void, unless there
are good reasons to keep it and that I'm missing.
> @@ -280,7 +291,10 @@ void *__devm_drm_panel_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, size_t offset,
> * @member: the name of the &drm_panel within @type
> * @funcs: callbacks for this panel
> * @connector_type: connector type of the driver
> - * The returned refcount is initialised to 1
> + *
> + * The returned refcount is initialised to 1. This reference will
> + * be automatically dropped via devm (by calling
> + * drm_bridge_put()) when @dev is removed.
^^^^^^
"panel". Same in a few other places in this patch. Please search in all
this series in case there are more. It's easy to forget about replacing
some of those in the comments. :)
Luca
--
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-26 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-25 17:24 [PATCH 0/5] drm/panel: Panel Refcounting infrastructure Anusha Srivatsa
2025-03-25 17:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/panel: Add new helpers for refcounted panel allocatons Anusha Srivatsa
2025-03-26 9:22 ` Luca Ceresoli
2025-03-26 15:26 ` Maxime Ripard
2025-03-26 15:25 ` Maxime Ripard
2025-03-25 17:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/panel: Add refcount support Anusha Srivatsa
2025-03-26 1:21 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-26 9:23 ` Luca Ceresoli [this message]
2025-03-26 15:30 ` Maxime Ripard
2025-03-26 15:28 ` Maxime Ripard
2025-03-25 17:24 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/panel: get/put panel reference in drm_panel_add/remove() Anusha Srivatsa
2025-03-26 0:18 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-26 4:35 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-26 9:23 ` Luca Ceresoli
2025-03-26 15:31 ` Maxime Ripard
2025-03-25 17:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/panel: deprecate old-style panel allocation Anusha Srivatsa
2025-03-26 9:23 ` Luca Ceresoli
2025-03-26 15:32 ` Maxime Ripard
2025-03-25 17:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/panel/panel-simple: Use the new allocation in place of devm_kzalloc() Anusha Srivatsa
2025-03-26 9:23 ` Luca Ceresoli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250326102304.49510630@booty \
--to=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=asrivats@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox