From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx.denx.de (mx.denx.de [89.58.32.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D73017E4; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:45:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=89.58.32.78 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743011158; cv=none; b=le6UdtNUPIxk6BHtG2VJi2tBZfR/ofOOwys6iDOhSC9l3GUUCX2c3wAioYC/4uL7TyC7pI0yMANm10xL4MtIbs3M1R6XBYc0Bm2cuvvme6U95PzFtBMpejwne8j5id7miK2Vm0dgmgJ832Sb8KajnsgRbtHT0TNb+vvm6YLK3+Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743011158; c=relaxed/simple; bh=t1iLPADlrRh7sTkLR+8K2hYQjsHR9MdLT3BhEufi6uY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YuP0moeR8JKfq/7/+ikkpdcmur3liaXln2yYWx2E0YKDf+9l5MNqogQWsYZkcMlBX2VqAnyzQTalErJV5YL+Qztvm6YJLyhIwTmIINnnlvAtU+OvDwP+Z+NEK+cNyKnDrcrlHgrBSfCUducnWUMiUzsIZDX4gr6CzXmKRAHqKws= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=denx.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=denx.de header.i=@denx.de header.b=aMSBvJQZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=89.58.32.78 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=denx.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=denx.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=denx.de header.i=@denx.de header.b="aMSBvJQZ" Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 3E79210246DBA; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 18:45:54 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=denx.de; s=mx-20241105; t=1743011154; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to:references; bh=H2uGHhEWg3JZ/p8Dt7d9szFu3FMB52FFPqrpmORpQ8A=; b=aMSBvJQZByJxxa9rDE0UHlPGY9xvTFLXnmGeZg2qR59XMscq6ggfcXSetM6lLMrLC3mUKl vZSBOK2Ld/1tScvTiyLVpeNZUHU+PfhaB+e/9+h7rBBvIa6Jy/bl3RlT5+ZwQHY1Qg6Lzi IEK+k6MJ2zjbFDIYsA8WNyLftzzZbS+yF/ys6ORRM2Op8NYcJywIX5yollJ45PvZsvoiX9 DMJX3WQbgVEX4UOiVlaS85mLREDqIdtHv9Eg+fX17Wvc67Bjg+yUch9l7ZP936PGPRZTUL a34vC8u8BU1hNAkudOgOlDTaBeYR7WfPiQV16B3/itcTj4klOD7Uv8wHdJufeQ== Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 18:45:53 +0100 From: Lukasz Majewski To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spidev: Add compatible for LWE's btt device Message-ID: <20250326184553.0756c496@wsk> In-Reply-To: <83685ed2-f41a-456c-8a22-0ac069304386@sirena.org.uk> References: <20250326174228.14dfdf8c@wsk> <20250326172445.2693640-1-lukma@denx.de> <83685ed2-f41a-456c-8a22-0ac069304386@sirena.org.uk> Organization: denx.de X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.19.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/2TmOQDCUmF/H18MMAiJ03ic"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 --Sig_/2TmOQDCUmF/H18MMAiJ03ic Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mark, > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 06:24:45PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >=20 > > Changes for v2: > > - Use 'lwn' vendor prefix instead of 'lwe' (as the former one is > > already well used in Linux sources). =20 >=20 > Are you sure? Yes, the lwn is already present for a quite few years for this company. The lwe is just the different branch. >=20 > Note also that as previously mentioned I expect to see a binding > document update too which doesn't appear to be here. >=20 I've just send it to be accepted to trivial-devices.yaml > Please don't send new patches in reply to old patches or serieses, > this makes it harder for both people and tools to understand what is > going on - it can bury things in mailboxes and make it difficult to > keep track of what current patches are, both for the new patches and > the old ones. Ok, I thought that it would be the opposite - that you would see v2 as the reply to the old one - especially that the change is just a single letter. Best regards, Lukasz Majewski -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@denx.de --Sig_/2TmOQDCUmF/H18MMAiJ03ic Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEgAyFJ+N6uu6+XupJAR8vZIA0zr0FAmfkPVEACgkQAR8vZIA0 zr00NQgAhPs6iLe5eGeJbcOnS+YaVgIIuosnstmqfPtM4c2H9vVehP1fyt6p0+6e NcD1H2VXAz78n0ur9Ba2/FLfIJl8xDNT8npBxybJVvEPy6xWEkcxIcKkqYkuV0xB oXeXTuWcK9p8Amqm35OInDjBrIie5rKpMpYxhJ1HeVeD7EgDGNQc3rMW+jBXN2DL 2U9fnw6rg1xOQPnJX0RsRgZCUT4Z6PyuzvjlnoNv20JMchJx12PnXbds46iFYAhQ MflE7bsOZWxHxXAIwu4yEAY8hsBegOXDPQedaLLSx8s+mkuhraYqyqkzYYLnRs5h aUPENLEL3T4ikgu6LdrV6Ag2Pngvng== =uKOe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/2TmOQDCUmF/H18MMAiJ03ic--