From: Frederick Lawler <fred@cloudflare.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Cc: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ima-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@cloudfalre.com,
Frederick Lawler <fred@cloudflare.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] ima: process_measurement() needlessly takes inode_lock() on MAY_READ
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 11:09:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250327160916.279090-1-fred@cloudflare.com> (raw)
On IMA policy update, if a measure rule exists in the policy,
IMA_MEASURE is set for ima_policy_flags which makes the violation_check
variable always true. Coupled with a no-action on MAY_READ for a
FILE_CHECK call, we're always taking the inode_lock().
This becomes a performance problem for extremely heavy read-only workloads.
Therefore, prevent this only in the case there's no action to be taken.
Signed-off-by: Frederick Lawler <fred@cloudflare.com>
---
Changes since v2:
- s/mask & MAY_WRITE/file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE/
Changes since v1:
- Add MAY_WRITE && action check to violation_check to avoid MAY_READ
only situations
---
security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index 9b87556b03a7..bc453f5a7531 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -237,7 +237,9 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred,
&allowed_algos);
violation_check = ((func == FILE_CHECK || func == MMAP_CHECK ||
func == MMAP_CHECK_REQPROT) &&
- (ima_policy_flag & IMA_MEASURE));
+ (ima_policy_flag & IMA_MEASURE) &&
+ ((action & IMA_MEASURE) ||
+ (file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)));
if (!action && !violation_check)
return 0;
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-27 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-27 16:09 Frederick Lawler [this message]
2025-03-27 16:29 ` [PATCH v3] ima: process_measurement() needlessly takes inode_lock() on MAY_READ Roberto Sassu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250327160916.279090-1-fred@cloudflare.com \
--to=fred@cloudflare.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudfalre.com \
--cc=linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-ima-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox