From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin (Intel)" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>,
"Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@alien8.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip: x86/core] x86/cpufeatures: Generate the <asm/cpufeaturemasks.h> header based on build config
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:23:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250328162311.08134fa6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR02MB4157D2C2260E6BD529BCF08AD4A52@SN6PR02MB4157.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
On Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:06:07 +0000 Michael Kelley wrote:
> > > With this commit, changing the modified time on .config causes cpufeaturemasks.h
> > > to be rebuilt, and then all dependencies on cpufeaturemasks.h are also rebuilt. It
> > > doesn't figure out that nothing has changed in .config. A fair amount of
> > > unnecessary rebuilding is done.
> >
> > Hmm. Normally it is the tools that *create* the config file that
> > should notice that it hasn't changed, and not write a new one.
> >
> > See conf_write() in scripts/kconfig/confdata.c for the particular case
> > of the regular "make *config*'
> >
> > > I'm seeing this changed behavior specifically with the make-kpkg script on
> > > Ubuntu 20.04. It's not clear why make-kpkg is updating the modified time
> > > on .config, but prior to this commit, that update had no negative effect.
> >
> > It sounds like the make-kpkg script should probably be fixed to not
> > overwrite the config file unconditionally, and do that "make
> > oldconfig" and friends do, which is to notice when it hasn't changed
> > and leave it alone.
> >
>
> For the record, the problem with make-kpkg is that it does "make syncconfig"
> multiple times in prepping to build, sometimes passing environment
> variable ARCH=x86 and sometimes ARCH=x86_64. scripts/kconfig/conf uses
> that environment variable to decorate the header of the generated .config
> file, and to force a rebuild in include/config/auto.conf.cmd if the value changes.
> So flipping between two different values causes a "new" .config to be
> generated even though nothing of substance has changed.
>
> I hacked the make-kpkg scripts to consistently use ARCH=x86 and that
> solves the problem. But this is a private hack as make-kpkg hasn't been
> updated in years and is no longer supported. In Ubuntu releases, it is
> deprecated after 20.04.
FWIW this also makes netdev CI melt down. Combination of allmodconfig
insisting on WERROR, us insisting on W=1, and this change insisting on
full kernel rebuild every time .config is touched :( IOW we do:
make allmodconfig
./scripts/config -d werror
make -j W=1
Could a hack like this fly? I don't see an easy way out ..
diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile
index a607769a25af..35401572d039 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/Makefile
@@ -276,7 +276,9 @@ cpufeaturemasks.awk := $(srctree)/arch/x86/tools/cpufeaturemasks.awk
cpufeatures_hdr := $(srctree)/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
targets += $(cpufeaturemasks.hdr)
quiet_cmd_gen_featuremasks = GEN $@
- cmd_gen_featuremasks = $(AWK) -f $(cpufeaturemasks.awk) $(cpufeatures_hdr) $(KCONFIG_CONFIG) > $@
+ cmd_gen_featuremasks = $(AWK) -f $(cpufeaturemasks.awk) $(cpufeatures_hdr) $(KCONFIG_CONFIG) > $@.new; \
+ if [ -e $@ ] && cmp -s $@ $@.new; then rm $@.new; \
+ else mv $@.new $@; fi
$(cpufeaturemasks.hdr): $(cpufeaturemasks.awk) $(cpufeatures_hdr) $(KCONFIG_CONFIG) FORCE
$(shell mkdir -p $(dir $@))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-28 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-05 18:47 [PATCH v7 0/4] x86/cpufeatures: Automatically generate required and disabled feature masks Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-05 18:47 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] x86/cpufeatures: Add {required,disabled} feature configs Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-05 18:47 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] x86/cpufeatures: Generate a feature mask header based on build config Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-10 8:18 ` [tip: x86/cpu] x86/cpufeatures: Generate the <asm/cpufeaturemasks.h> " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2025-03-20 16:23 ` Michael Kelley
2025-03-20 16:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-23 18:06 ` Michael Kelley
2025-03-28 23:23 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-03-29 0:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-29 0:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-29 0:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-01 7:00 ` [PATCH] x86: don't re-generate cpufeaturemasks.h so eagerly Ingo Molnar
2025-03-29 0:56 ` [tip: x86/core] x86/cpufeatures: Generate the <asm/cpufeaturemasks.h> header based on build config H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-05 18:47 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] x86/cpufeatures: Remove {disabled,required}-features.h Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-10 8:18 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-05 18:47 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] x86/cpufeatures: Use AWK to generate {REQUIRED|DISABLED}_MASK_BIT_SET Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-07 18:28 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] x86/cpufeatures: Automatically generate required and disabled feature masks Xin Li
2025-03-07 19:18 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250328162311.08134fa6@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox