From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 545FF1C5D77 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 21:25:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743542742; cv=none; b=ItSm1HTAamuyVJhir8BarJ9jN7LwAdCvBNIh03ou78J69hTgzsiZkix9477wRW+Eggqtyuw1r4M0u2iZGzC22h3WiME01Pr8eFxWEWqoK/B6Dmy3fukd0gPIVi17fp+ajFq6crTyxK7ecDt0lz2lwIK/5JYcfHW++uMJb3HvkJQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743542742; c=relaxed/simple; bh=54QxVgX0vDgvicMblfreJzIuov/RdbPVNpgnc9nMHSk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=bV9FqN5eGmhDjLQLMfB5Bq6OCKdfPXA4zGauS0DdVBtLgaspTvwg88veC12GGxsWas5Vx1rRnD5OYyH3udr3+jyen/aclhnaeBonDbk8S4tv4E89AJbtpU1L380YeBiEEqhU5KdBxVl6UKkyg7YDBVTpPiyRKdTKRWvbR8hr8W0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=kJ9rhkQj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="kJ9rhkQj" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE845C4CEE4; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 21:25:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1743542741; bh=54QxVgX0vDgvicMblfreJzIuov/RdbPVNpgnc9nMHSk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=kJ9rhkQjgwJy0Dry2MVrr4QfT7FfqvpyEf0tbrkkSgLZH1G9ckBp0PbsRTk9pgz1A 5oXxfDkwigT1IltLDjnpEax5Vpei3gqcmaC6/3S+jexySZ7u9WjxUrtjdihpVcxn3F bTxMtrBTz/yVsIuBG+SH+6eh8pCN9w5qvEaRtzvAx7nQ2uPmEdv8XCC8reVEGeS2iz w980o91j5s5fvEiT/EQXfEt9AZ16j2k5Ff9qcHcuFAON7e7ZjF+eKDdC4XPFNcIaGO grlDVRRfCvern+cx57xbv0xqpxlMv5ZOncFKv5mJH1h5uvPsiZAeQcA57ps4QMTQhx V47XETGvzUsdw== From: SeongJae Park To: "Liam R. Howlett" Cc: SeongJae Park , Andrew Morton , "Liam R. Howlett" , David Hildenbrand , Lorenzo Stoakes , Shakeel Butt , Vlastimil Babka , kernel-team@meta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] mm/memory: split non-tlb flushing part from zap_page_range_single() Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 14:25:38 -0700 Message-Id: <20250401212538.81728-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 10:03:17 -0400 "Liam R. Howlett" wrote: > * SeongJae Park [250331 22:48]: > > On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 21:45:40 -0400 "Liam R. Howlett" wrote: > > > > > * SeongJae Park [250310 13:24]: [...] > Thanks. I don't really mind if you have anything else to name it, as > long as it reduces the confusion. Fully agreed and thanks again for the nice name suggestion. [...] > > That makes sense. In the next revision, I will add the kernel-doc comment > > here, but not as a valid kernel-doc comment (maybe wtarts with /* instead of > > /**) since this function is a static function as of this patch. On the next > > patch that makes this non-static, I will make the comment a valid kernel-doc > > comment with a minimum change. > > > > I prefer not having a valid kernel-doc comment for static function, but that's > > just a personal preferrence and I have no strong reason to object other way. > > Please feel free to let me know if you prefer making it valid kernel doc > > comment starting from this patch. > > > > Yes, that was what I was thinking as well. Thanks for kindly clarifying, Liam :) Thanks, SJ [...]