From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: Better document teardown for delayed_work
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:31:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250403083155.37931-2-phasta@kernel.org> (raw)
destroy_workqueue() does not ensure that non-pending work submitted with
queue_delayed_work() gets cancelled. The caller has to ensure that
manually.
Add this information about delayed_work in destroy_workqueue()'s
docstring.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
---
Hi,
I have seen this WARN_ON [1] fire in my code for testing the DRM GPU
Scheduler, where a (non-delayed) work_item from workqueue A submits
delayed_work to workqueue B [2].
From my experience so far and reading the documentation, I didn't expect
this to happen.
Assuming this is wanted behavior (?), I propose documenting this more
explicitly. Or could it be possible to modify destroy_workqueue() so
that it takes care of submitted delayed_work()?
Greetings,
P.
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.14-rc6/source/kernel/workqueue.c#L2257
[2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pstanner/schedleaker/-/blob/goodmemmodell/schedleaker.c?ref_type=heads#L291
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index bfe030b443e2..5a30efe7ddeb 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -5837,6 +5837,9 @@ static bool pwq_busy(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
* @wq: target workqueue
*
* Safely destroy a workqueue. All work currently pending will be done first.
+ * This does not apply to non-pending work that was submitted with
+ * queue_delayed_work(). Such work must be cancelled manually before calling
+ * this function.
*/
void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
{
--
2.48.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-04-03 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-03 8:31 Philipp Stanner [this message]
2025-04-03 18:54 ` [PATCH] workqueue: Better document teardown for delayed_work Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250403083155.37931-2-phasta@kernel.org \
--to=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox