From: "Naveen N Rao (AMD)" <naveen@kernel.org>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation/x86: Clarify naming of CPU features for /proc/cpuinfo
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 15:13:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250403094308.2297617-1-naveen@kernel.org> (raw)
Commit 78ce84b9e0a5 ("x86/cpufeatures: Flip the /proc/cpuinfo appearance
logic") changed how CPU feature names should be specified. Update
document to reflect the same.
Signed-off-by: Naveen N Rao (AMD) <naveen@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst | 42 +++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst
index 6ef426a52cdc..fecdc36e02a1 100644
--- a/Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst
@@ -124,37 +124,21 @@ also defined in cpufeatures.h.
Naming of Flags
===============
-The script arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mkcapflags.sh processes the
-#define X86_FEATURE_<name> from cpufeatures.h and generates the
-x86_cap/bug_flags[] arrays in kernel/cpu/capflags.c. The names in the
-resulting x86_cap/bug_flags[] are used to populate /proc/cpuinfo. The naming
-of flags in the x86_cap/bug_flags[] are as follows:
-
-a: The name of the flag is from the string in X86_FEATURE_<name> by default.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-By default, the flag <name> in /proc/cpuinfo is extracted from the respective
-X86_FEATURE_<name> in cpufeatures.h. For example, the flag "avx2" is from
-X86_FEATURE_AVX2.
-
-b: The naming can be overridden.
---------------------------------
If the comment on the line for the #define X86_FEATURE_* starts with a
-double-quote character (""), the string inside the double-quote characters
-will be the name of the flags. For example, the flag "sse4_1" comes from
-the comment "sse4_1" following the X86_FEATURE_XMM4_1 definition.
+double-quote character (""), the string inside the double-quote characters will
+be the name of the flag. For example, the flag "sse4_1" comes from the comment
+"sse4_1" following the X86_FEATURE_XMM4_1 definition. /proc/cpuinfo is a
+userspace interface and must remain constant. If, for some reason, the naming
+of X86_FEATURE_<name> changes, one shall retain the name already used in
+/proc/cpuinfo.
-There are situations in which overriding the displayed name of the flag is
-needed. For instance, /proc/cpuinfo is a userspace interface and must remain
-constant. If, for some reason, the naming of X86_FEATURE_<name> changes, one
-shall override the new naming with the name already used in /proc/cpuinfo.
-
-c: The naming override can be "", which means it will not appear in /proc/cpuinfo.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-The feature shall be omitted from /proc/cpuinfo if it does not make sense for
-the feature to be exposed to userspace. For example, X86_FEATURE_ALWAYS is
-defined in cpufeatures.h but that flag is an internal kernel feature used
-in the alternative runtime patching functionality. So, its name is overridden
-with "". Its flag will not appear in /proc/cpuinfo.
+If the comment on the line does not start with a double-quote character, then
+it will be omitted from /proc/cpuinfo. This is desirable if it does not make
+sense for the feature to be exposed to userspace. For example,
+X86_FEATURE_ALWAYS is defined in cpufeatures.h but that flag is an internal
+kernel feature used in the alternative runtime patching functionality. So, no
+name is specified within double-quotes and its flag will not appear in
+/proc/cpuinfo.
Flags are missing when one or more of these happen
==================================================
base-commit: 1c13554a1d43317fe9009837ef6524f808e107b7
--
2.48.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-04-03 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-03 9:43 Naveen N Rao (AMD) [this message]
2025-04-03 10:55 ` [PATCH] Documentation/x86: Clarify naming of CPU features for /proc/cpuinfo Bagas Sanjaya
2025-04-03 12:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-04-03 13:10 ` Naveen N Rao
2025-04-03 13:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-04-03 15:02 ` Naveen N Rao
2025-04-09 11:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] Documentation/x86: Update the " Borislav Petkov
2025-04-09 12:04 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Naveen N Rao (AMD)
2025-04-09 11:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] Documentation/x86: Zap the subsection letters Borislav Petkov
2025-04-09 12:04 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov (AMD)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250403094308.2297617-1-naveen@kernel.org \
--to=naveen@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox