From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Kunkun Jiang <jiangkunkun@huawei.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Keisuke Nishimura <keisuke.nishimura@inria.fr>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] RISC-V: KVM: switch to kvm_lock/unlock_all_vcpus
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 21:41:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250409014136.2816971-5-mlevitsk@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250409014136.2816971-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
use kvm_lock/unlock_all_vcpus instead of riscv's own
implementation.
Note that this does introduce a slight functional change - now vCPUs are
unlocked in the same order they were locked and not in the opposite order.
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
---
arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c | 34 ++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c
index 39cd26af5a69..a4599de98c6b 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c
@@ -12,36 +12,6 @@
#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
-static void unlock_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm, int vcpu_lock_idx)
-{
- struct kvm_vcpu *tmp_vcpu;
-
- for (; vcpu_lock_idx >= 0; vcpu_lock_idx--) {
- tmp_vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, vcpu_lock_idx);
- mutex_unlock(&tmp_vcpu->mutex);
- }
-}
-
-static void unlock_all_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
-{
- unlock_vcpus(kvm, atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus) - 1);
-}
-
-static bool lock_all_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
-{
- struct kvm_vcpu *tmp_vcpu;
- unsigned long c;
-
- kvm_for_each_vcpu(c, tmp_vcpu, kvm) {
- if (!mutex_trylock(&tmp_vcpu->mutex)) {
- unlock_vcpus(kvm, c - 1);
- return false;
- }
- }
-
- return true;
-}
-
static int aia_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
{
int ret;
@@ -53,7 +23,7 @@ static int aia_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
return -EEXIST;
ret = -EBUSY;
- if (!lock_all_vcpus(kvm))
+ if (kvm_lock_all_vcpus(kvm, true))
return ret;
kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
@@ -65,7 +35,7 @@ static int aia_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
kvm->arch.aia.in_kernel = true;
out_unlock:
- unlock_all_vcpus(kvm);
+ kvm_unlock_all_vcpus(kvm);
return ret;
}
--
2.26.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-09 1:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-09 1:41 [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: extract lock_all_vcpus/unlock_all_vcpus Maxim Levitsky
2025-04-09 1:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] locking/mutex: implement mutex_trylock_nested Maxim Levitsky
2025-04-10 8:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-09 1:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: x86: move sev_lock/unlock_vcpus_for_migration to kvm_main.c Maxim Levitsky
2025-04-09 13:47 ` Waiman Long
2025-04-09 20:45 ` Oliver Upton
2025-04-10 8:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-16 17:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-04-16 18:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-17 9:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-04-09 1:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: arm64: switch to using kvm_lock/unlock_all_vcpus Maxim Levitsky
2025-04-09 1:41 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2025-04-09 19:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: extract lock_all_vcpus/unlock_all_vcpus Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250409014136.2816971-5-mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiangkunkun@huawei.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=keisuke.nishimura@inria.fr \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sebott@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox