From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Rework inter-NUMA newidle balancing
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:14:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250410101402.GC30687@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250409111539.23791-5-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 11:15:38AM +0000, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> +static inline int sched_newidle_pull_overloaded(struct sched_domain *sd,
> + struct rq *this_rq,
> + int *continue_balancing)
> +{
> + struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(load_balance_mask);
> + int cpu, this_cpu = cpu_of(this_rq);
> + struct sched_domain *sd_parent;
> + struct lb_env env = {
> + .dst_cpu = this_cpu,
> + .dst_rq = this_rq,
> + .idle = CPU_NEWLY_IDLE,
> + };
> +
> +
> + cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), cpu_active_mask);
> +
> +next_domain:
> + env.sd = sd;
> + /* Allow migrating cache_hot tasks too. */
> + sd->nr_balance_failed = sd->cache_nice_tries + 1;
> +
> + for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, this_cpu) {
> + struct sched_domain_shared *sd_share;
> + struct cpumask *overloaded_mask;
> + struct sched_domain *cpu_llc;
> + int overloaded_cpu;
> +
> + cpu_llc = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc, cpu));
> + if (!cpu_llc)
> + break;
> +
> + sd_share = cpu_llc->shared;
> + if (!sd_share)
> + break;
> +
> + overloaded_mask = sd_share->overloaded_mask;
> + if (!overloaded_mask)
> + break;
> +
> + for_each_cpu_wrap(overloaded_cpu, overloaded_mask, this_cpu + 1) {
> + struct rq *overloaded_rq = cpu_rq(overloaded_cpu);
> + struct task_struct *p = NULL;
> +
> + if (sched_newidle_continue_balance(this_rq)) {
> + *continue_balancing = 0;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* Quick peek to find if pushable tasks exist. */
> + if (!has_pushable_tasks(overloaded_rq))
> + continue;
> +
> + scoped_guard (rq_lock, overloaded_rq) {
> + update_rq_clock(overloaded_rq);
> +
> + if (!has_pushable_tasks(overloaded_rq))
> + break;
You can skip the clock update if there aren't any tasks to grab.
> +
> + env.src_cpu = overloaded_cpu;
> + env.src_rq = overloaded_rq;
> +
> + p = detach_one_task(&env);
Yep, detach_one_task() uses can_migrate_task() which checks
task_on_cpu(), so that's all good :-)
> + }
> +
> + if (!p)
> + continue;
> +
> + attach_one_task(this_rq, p);
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + cpumask_andnot(cpus, cpus, sched_domain_span(cpu_llc));
> + }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-10 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-09 11:15 [RFC PATCH 0/5] K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Add push task framework K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-10 15:25 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Introduce overloaded_mask in sched_domain_shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-10 15:26 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Update overloaded mask in presence of pushable task K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-14 2:28 ` Aaron Lu
2025-04-14 3:13 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-21 5:20 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-21 5:54 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-21 8:03 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-21 8:54 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Rework inter-NUMA newidle balancing K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-04-10 15:27 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Proactive idle balance using push mechanism K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-10 15:37 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:17 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] sched/fair: Idle and newidle balancing " K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250410101402.GC30687@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox