public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
	Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Rework inter-NUMA newidle balancing
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:14:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250410101402.GC30687@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250409111539.23791-5-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>

On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 11:15:38AM +0000, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> +static inline int sched_newidle_pull_overloaded(struct sched_domain *sd,
> +						struct rq *this_rq,
> +						int *continue_balancing)
> +{
> +	struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(load_balance_mask);
> +	int cpu, this_cpu = cpu_of(this_rq);
> +	struct sched_domain *sd_parent;
> +	struct lb_env env = {
> +		.dst_cpu	= this_cpu,
> +		.dst_rq		= this_rq,
> +		.idle		= CPU_NEWLY_IDLE,
> +	};
> +
> +
> +	cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), cpu_active_mask);
> +
> +next_domain:
> +	env.sd = sd;
> +	/* Allow migrating cache_hot tasks too. */
> +	sd->nr_balance_failed = sd->cache_nice_tries + 1;
> +
> +	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, this_cpu) {
> +		struct sched_domain_shared *sd_share;
> +		struct cpumask *overloaded_mask;
> +		struct sched_domain *cpu_llc;
> +		int overloaded_cpu;
> +
> +		cpu_llc = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc, cpu));
> +		if (!cpu_llc)
> +			break;
> +
> +		sd_share = cpu_llc->shared;
> +		if (!sd_share)
> +			break;
> +
> +		overloaded_mask = sd_share->overloaded_mask;
> +		if (!overloaded_mask)
> +			break;
> +
> +		for_each_cpu_wrap(overloaded_cpu, overloaded_mask, this_cpu + 1) {
> +			struct rq *overloaded_rq = cpu_rq(overloaded_cpu);
> +			struct task_struct *p = NULL;
> +
> +			if (sched_newidle_continue_balance(this_rq)) {
> +				*continue_balancing = 0;
> +				return 0;
> +			}
> +
> +			/* Quick peek to find if pushable tasks exist. */
> +			if (!has_pushable_tasks(overloaded_rq))
> +				continue;
> +
> +			scoped_guard (rq_lock, overloaded_rq) {
> +				update_rq_clock(overloaded_rq);
> +
> +				if (!has_pushable_tasks(overloaded_rq))
> +					break;

You can skip the clock update if there aren't any tasks to grab.

> +
> +				env.src_cpu = overloaded_cpu;
> +				env.src_rq = overloaded_rq;
> +
> +				p = detach_one_task(&env);

Yep, detach_one_task() uses can_migrate_task() which checks
task_on_cpu(), so that's all good :-)

> +			}
> +
> +			if (!p)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			attach_one_task(this_rq, p);
> +			return 1;
> +		}
> +
> +		cpumask_andnot(cpus, cpus, sched_domain_span(cpu_llc));
> +	}

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-10 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-09 11:15 [RFC PATCH 0/5] K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Add push task framework K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-10 15:25     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Introduce overloaded_mask in sched_domain_shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-10 15:26     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Update overloaded mask in presence of pushable task K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-14  2:28   ` Aaron Lu
2025-04-14  3:13     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-21  5:20   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-21  5:54     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-21  8:03       ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-21  8:54         ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Rework inter-NUMA newidle balancing K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:14   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-04-10 15:27     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Proactive idle balance using push mechanism K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-10 15:37     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:17 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] sched/fair: Idle and newidle balancing " K Prateek Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250410101402.GC30687@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox