From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1279916DC28 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744291783; cv=none; b=UiCsIzSDqwgmOveYmALhTd8Y46aGrMp7KXvB8fS7awznKwq8obhFHPmhRGc7Bu5C4QzJMACsLZhTJWipxsIIZmJRv7FGmpFu8MDY9rtAi6Uxg7Oj0N9TWwn4ttjPGd/hs5VFRrX8MzKDYhD4Fw5BxV5krpOYE7QeLJ+UFqtD79E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744291783; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bq0+zzz8gpCkI2u450fNXD8guqy8VI6lmKIFlJ5A+p0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lo1t3IGxTrYno3rvXOw2VPfKJ0IdkZgfpSiCazbHU78lgX9Nr3WaLX/SQdwlGG562abntm5AO4Z3FkL9onsvJdqTR47HutitaU5ZsuT+RlN5s/K6XJbUdKmQ8WivoMj1JF3kJnNQkX9ZKth1Al/hfL1bu+i1JIuMWUcu82JMbm0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=m21pi5dx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="m21pi5dx" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1744291780; bh=bq0+zzz8gpCkI2u450fNXD8guqy8VI6lmKIFlJ5A+p0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=m21pi5dxxrSSBXqvw+Lyd7FzPWHu0dX7/dlcX+47p4IGO66l6SB1QKoOMKaNlnbUR zT3YYOI7RlrudsfYWChxfDI0jBAS+Rql4G4oKBKcZDFBAs4iSd+lV+gk05ciJxNMgV e49f5OrWuWKC6NY4flQTg7zb0DT8hni0W/GsQOFONzp8tdYBLhUTsT+S5CRIEQDqVN WXSQKtDDxVdXaV68oTP5qblp+UezyrHwpDwO6usANbldLqF4d3NncM5hKlxceSO+i+ Ixaf3UlAPBcCfdrLFeoGyKk09mvjM06Tpiomd3+bepcccUwd/PShLm2YIUjK8AuVt8 SdlAShjaxYzPg== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:2c:6930:5cf4:84a1:2763:fe0d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bbrezillon) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C566117E101A; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 15:29:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 15:29:35 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Karunika Choo Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nd@arm.com, Steven Price , Liviu Dudau , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/panthor: Use 64-bit and poll register accessors Message-ID: <20250410152935.25ba7255@collabora.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20250320111741.1937892-1-karunika.choo@arm.com> <20250320111741.1937892-3-karunika.choo@arm.com> <20250321085306.0d79ec5d@collabora.com> Organization: Collabora X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.43; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 14:07:20 +0100 Karunika Choo wrote: > On 21/03/2025 07:53, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 11:17:34 +0000 > > Karunika Choo wrote: > > > >> This patch updates Panthor to use the new 64-bit accessors and poll > >> functions. > > > > nit: I don't think it makes sense to dissociate the introduction of the > > new helpers and their use. Could we squash this patch into the previous > > one? > > It was previously requested that I split the patches into two to ease > review. I can merge it back into the previous one in v3. Thanks. Could we also have that submitted in a separate patch, so we can merge it while we're discussing the rest of the patch series?