From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from m16.mail.163.com (m16.mail.163.com [220.197.31.3]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAD318FDAB; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 01:52:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.3 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744854755; cv=none; b=jjdGbFVc5i/hSVsubTm07TxOMM4Z57LojkUhd6cR0BxQi8RopuC7Yt6SPk3o9EjqCdZxy3ZKVueKOtyyKE+CU2EYhw+lu+XFjJkEIq53Wcj4oJwWnQnjc2p9nwgoKDPIl5lU3VBztRJvMRTQmBli2wmLCNBhEfk4cX6RDfoGoc8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744854755; c=relaxed/simple; bh=F/5d1IghKb0pg2zSrK+aro4P7knuhG6MLhzJzvNfyUA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=jXIFF5EVYEi0BVOxhZnHhbaLXIxNmfrXm4GD9YWsBPorMi04OqVhTo987Ugkgf/QqILTbPmu7xT0ymUgoWLFeBGlTy9nd0XMgV5IwwNLrLUEmVD3QEw/rf9GeCrtRyiT0BVMYFQaNLY4Tdc+OwilcQ/NMMfIZcvnfppCy9eQ1hY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b=FAdTRrHE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.3 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b="FAdTRrHE" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; bh=OC0HT YodGB+352Xa0PvGM8HnRnVdjQBVMt67uxyrdSA=; b=FAdTRrHEnKUBfII6NIiYH UfBuEBAXKRFaoOsVEEV/SjYOiijWnLkHHxhOkTTjFPyEd72d+rMPUL+l6fk9FtFg m/CgKrpo4sslg/Jar5lopzB2zgWU6pBIG0oZeqEqaIc++yn183j/jUK8lxLCA2nB N4aV4RuTIskErVxa2AyYyI= Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown []) by gzsmtp5 (Coremail) with SMTP id QCgvCgA3kaEGXgBopyyzAg--.31710S4; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 09:48:59 +0800 (CST) From: Feng Yang To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, hengqi.chen@gmail.com, olsajiri@gmail.com Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: Add test for attaching uprobe with long event names Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 09:48:47 +0800 Message-Id: <20250417014848.59321-3-yangfeng59949@163.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20250417014848.59321-1-yangfeng59949@163.com> References: <20250417014848.59321-1-yangfeng59949@163.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID:QCgvCgA3kaEGXgBopyyzAg--.31710S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvJXoWxAF4DCw4fXF13GFyDWFW8Xrb_yoW5WF4fpa 1v9ryYkF45X3W29FZ8G34qkr4rtr18Gr1xGr1Dtr13XF4UWF1xXry7AF4YyFnxJrZav3W5 A3y3tryUWay7ZFDanT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDUYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07jOWrXUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: p1dqww5hqjkmqzuzqiywtou0bp/1tbiTgwyeGgAWMbTUwAAs+ From: Feng Yang This test verifies that attaching uprobe/uretprobe with long event names does not trigger EINVAL errors. Signed-off-by: Feng Yang --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c index 329c7862b52d..9b7f36f39c32 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c @@ -122,6 +122,52 @@ static void test_attach_probe_manual(enum probe_attach_mode attach_mode) test_attach_probe_manual__destroy(skel); } +/* attach uprobe/uretprobe long event name testings */ +static void test_attach_uprobe_long_event_name(void) +{ + DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_uprobe_opts, uprobe_opts); + struct bpf_link *uprobe_link, *uretprobe_link; + struct test_attach_probe_manual *skel; + ssize_t uprobe_offset; + char path[PATH_MAX] = {0}; + + skel = test_attach_probe_manual__open_and_load(); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_kprobe_manual_open_and_load")) + return; + + uprobe_offset = get_uprobe_offset(&trigger_func); + if (!ASSERT_GE(uprobe_offset, 0, "uprobe_offset")) + goto cleanup; + + if (!ASSERT_GT(readlink("/proc/self/exe", path, PATH_MAX - 1), 0, "readlink")) + goto cleanup; + + /* manual-attach uprobe/uretprobe */ + uprobe_opts.attach_mode = PROBE_ATTACH_MODE_LEGACY; + uprobe_opts.ref_ctr_offset = 0; + uprobe_opts.retprobe = false; + uprobe_link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_opts(skel->progs.handle_uprobe, + 0 /* self pid */, + path, + uprobe_offset, + &uprobe_opts); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(uprobe_link, "attach_uprobe_long_event_name")) + goto cleanup; + skel->links.handle_uprobe = uprobe_link; + + uprobe_opts.retprobe = true; + uretprobe_link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_opts(skel->progs.handle_uretprobe, + -1 /* any pid */, + path, + uprobe_offset, &uprobe_opts); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(uretprobe_link, "attach_uretprobe_long_event_name")) + goto cleanup; + skel->links.handle_uretprobe = uretprobe_link; + +cleanup: + test_attach_probe_manual__destroy(skel); +} + static void test_attach_probe_auto(struct test_attach_probe *skel) { struct bpf_link *uprobe_err_link; @@ -323,6 +369,9 @@ void test_attach_probe(void) if (test__start_subtest("uprobe-ref_ctr")) test_uprobe_ref_ctr(skel); + if (test__start_subtest("uprobe-long_name")) + test_attach_uprobe_long_event_name(); + cleanup: test_attach_probe__destroy(skel); ASSERT_EQ(uprobe_ref_ctr, 0, "uprobe_ref_ctr_cleanup"); -- 2.43.0