From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@arm.com>,
Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 4/7] sched: Fix runtime accounting w/ split exec & sched contexts
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 13:12:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250417111235.GK38216@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250412060258.3844594-5-jstultz@google.com>
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:02:38PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index e43993a4e5807..da8b0970c6655 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1143,22 +1143,33 @@ static void update_tg_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> -static s64 update_curr_se(struct rq *rq, struct sched_entity *curr)
> +static s64 update_se_times(struct rq *rq, struct sched_entity *se)
update_se()
> {
> u64 now = rq_clock_task(rq);
> s64 delta_exec;
>
> - delta_exec = now - curr->exec_start;
> + delta_exec = now - se->exec_start;
> if (unlikely(delta_exec <= 0))
> return delta_exec;
>
> - curr->exec_start = now;
> - curr->sum_exec_runtime += delta_exec;
> + se->exec_start = now;
> + if (entity_is_task(se)) {
> + struct task_struct *running = rq->curr;
> + /*
> + * If se is a task, we account the time against the running
> + * task, as w/ proxy-exec they may not be the same.
> + */
> + running->se.exec_start = now;
> + running->se.sum_exec_runtime += delta_exec;
> + } else {
> + /* If not task, account the time against se */
> + se->sum_exec_runtime += delta_exec;
> + }
So I am confused; you're accounting runtime to the actual running task,
but then accounting the same runtime to the cgroup of the donor.
This seems somewhat irregular.
Please consider all of update_curr_task(), and if they all want to be
against rq->curr, rather than rq->donor then more changes are needed.
> @@ -1213,7 +1224,7 @@ s64 update_curr_common(struct rq *rq)
> struct task_struct *donor = rq->donor;
> s64 delta_exec;
>
> - delta_exec = update_curr_se(rq, &donor->se);
> + delta_exec = update_se_times(rq, &donor->se);
> if (likely(delta_exec > 0))
> update_curr_task(donor, delta_exec);
>
> @@ -1233,7 +1244,7 @@ static void update_curr(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> if (unlikely(!curr))
> return;
>
> - delta_exec = update_curr_se(rq, curr);
> + delta_exec = update_se_times(rq, curr);
> if (unlikely(delta_exec <= 0))
> return;
I think I've tripped over this before, on how update_curr_common() uses
donor and update_curr() curr. This definitely needs a comment. Because
at first glance they're not the same.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-17 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-12 6:02 [PATCH v16 0/7] Single RunQueue Proxy Execution (v16) John Stultz
2025-04-12 6:02 ` [PATCH v16 1/7] sched: Add CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC & boot argument to enable/disable John Stultz
2025-04-14 8:50 ` Juri Lelli
2025-04-16 21:24 ` John Stultz
2025-04-29 9:16 ` Juri Lelli
2025-04-12 6:02 ` [PATCH v16 2/7] locking/mutex: Rework task_struct::blocked_on John Stultz
2025-04-14 8:59 ` Juri Lelli
2025-04-16 21:28 ` John Stultz
2025-04-12 6:02 ` [PATCH v16 3/7] locking/mutex: Add p->blocked_on wrappers for correctness checks John Stultz
2025-04-14 9:09 ` Juri Lelli
2025-04-16 22:44 ` John Stultz
2025-04-12 6:02 ` [PATCH v16 4/7] sched: Fix runtime accounting w/ split exec & sched contexts John Stultz
2025-04-14 9:28 ` Juri Lelli
2025-04-16 23:30 ` John Stultz
2025-04-29 9:24 ` Juri Lelli
2025-04-17 11:12 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-04-21 21:00 ` John Stultz
2025-04-24 13:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-26 3:34 ` John Stultz
2025-04-12 6:02 ` [PATCH v16 5/7] sched: Add an initial sketch of the find_proxy_task() function John Stultz
2025-04-14 9:41 ` Juri Lelli
2025-04-16 22:55 ` John Stultz
2025-04-17 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-22 21:14 ` John Stultz
2025-04-12 6:02 ` [PATCH v16 6/7] sched: Fix proxy/current (push,pull)ability John Stultz
2025-04-14 3:28 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-16 21:18 ` John Stultz
2025-04-12 6:02 ` [PATCH v16 7/7] sched: Start blocked_on chain processing in find_proxy_task() John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250417111235.GK38216@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Metin.Kaya@arm.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xuewen.yan94@gmail.com \
--cc=zezeozue@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox