From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Ruben Wauters <rubenru09@aol.com>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
Teddy Wang <teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] staging: sm250fb: remove USE_HW_I2C check
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 12:33:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025041836-debug-unstopped-9a88@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250417190302.13811-2-rubenru09@aol.com>
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 08:02:49PM +0100, Ruben Wauters wrote:
> Removes the USE_HW_I2C check and function defines in
> ddk750_sii164.c.
>
> The software equivalents were never used due to
> USE_HW_I2C being defined just before the ifdef, meaning
> the hardware versions were always used.
>
> The define names were also triggering checkpatch.pl's
> camel case check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ruben Wauters <rubenru09@aol.com>
>
> ---
>
> I am somewhat unsure whether this is the way to go or
> the correct way would be to add an option/opportunity for
> the software version to be used. Currently the hardware
> version is always used, but I am unsure if there ever even
> would be a case where you would want to use the software
> version over the hardware version.
Then the code can be added back, not an issue.
But you forgot this same check in
drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_hwi2c.c, right?
Also, what about removing the sm750_sw_i2c_write_reg() and other
functions that are now never referenced? Can you add that to this patch
series? A single series that just removes the use of USE_HW_I2C and the
now unneeded functions would be best, as it's not really a "coding
style" fix, but rather a code cleanup thing, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-18 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250417190302.13811-1-rubenru09.ref@aol.com>
2025-04-17 19:02 ` [PATCH 0/8] staging: sm750fb: cleanup ddk750_sii164 Ruben Wauters
2025-04-17 19:02 ` [PATCH 1/8] staging: sm250fb: remove USE_HW_I2C check Ruben Wauters
2025-04-18 10:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2025-04-18 11:42 ` Ruben Wauters
2025-04-17 19:02 ` [PATCH 2/8] staging: sm750fb: rename gDviCtrlChipName Ruben Wauters
2025-04-18 10:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-04-18 11:45 ` Ruben Wauters
2025-04-18 12:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-04-17 19:02 ` [PATCH 3/8] staging: sm750fb: rename vendorID to vendor_id Ruben Wauters
2025-04-18 10:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-04-17 19:02 ` [PATCH 4/8] staging: sm750fb: rename sii164_init_chip params Ruben Wauters
2025-04-17 19:02 ` [PATCH 5/8] staging: sm750fb: rename sii164_set_power's param Ruben Wauters
2025-04-18 10:34 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-04-17 19:02 ` [PATCH 6/8] staging: sm750fb: rename sii164SelectHotPlugDetectionMode Ruben Wauters
2025-04-17 19:02 ` [PATCH 7/8] staging: sm750fb: rename detectReg to detect_reg Ruben Wauters
2025-04-17 19:02 ` [PATCH 8/8] staging: sm750fb: rename hotPlugValue to hot_plug_value Ruben Wauters
2025-04-18 10:38 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025041836-debug-unstopped-9a88@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rubenru09@aol.com \
--cc=sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox