From: cem@kernel.org
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Hans.Holmberg@wdc.com, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, hch@lst.de,
lukas@wunner.de, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH] math.h: Account for 64-bit division on i386
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 13:51:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250419115157.567249-1-cem@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
Building linux on i386 might fail if a 64bit type is passed to
mult_fract(). To prevent the failure, use do_div() for the division
calculation instead of hardcoding a / b.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202504181233.F7D9Atra-lkp@intel.com/
---
I'm sending it as a RFC because I didn't to extensive testing on this
patch, also I'm not sure if mult_frac() was intended to work on 32-bit
only types. If that's the case, perhaps, a new mult_frac64() might be a
better idea?!
include/linux/math.h | 19 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/math.h b/include/linux/math.h
index 0198c92cbe3e..05ea853b75b4 100644
--- a/include/linux/math.h
+++ b/include/linux/math.h
@@ -133,15 +133,16 @@ __STRUCT_FRACT(u32)
#undef __STRUCT_FRACT
/* Calculate "x * n / d" without unnecessary overflow or loss of precision. */
-#define mult_frac(x, n, d) \
-({ \
- typeof(x) x_ = (x); \
- typeof(n) n_ = (n); \
- typeof(d) d_ = (d); \
- \
- typeof(x_) q = x_ / d_; \
- typeof(x_) r = x_ % d_; \
- q * n_ + r * n_ / d_; \
+#define mult_frac(x, n, d) \
+({ \
+ typeof(x) x_ = (x); \
+ typeof(n) n_ = (n); \
+ typeof(d) d_ = (d); \
+ \
+ typeof(x_) r = do_div(x_, d_); \
+ r *= n_; \
+ do_div(r, d_); \
+ x_ * n_ + r; \
})
#define sector_div(a, b) do_div(a, b)
--
2.49.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-04-19 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-19 11:51 cem [this message]
2025-04-20 15:40 ` [RFC PATCH] math.h: Account for 64-bit division on i386 Guenter Roeck
2025-04-20 17:42 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-04-20 18:05 ` Carlos Maiolino
2025-04-23 7:02 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-04-20 18:01 ` Carlos Maiolino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250419115157.567249-1-cem@kernel.org \
--to=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=Hans.Holmberg@wdc.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox