From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
To: "Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Philipp Stanner" <phasta@kernel.org>,
"Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/nouveau: Remove waitque for sched teardown
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 11:55:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250424095535.26119-7-phasta@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250424095535.26119-2-phasta@kernel.org>
struct nouveau_sched contains a waitque needed to prevent
drm_sched_fini() from being called while there are still jobs pending.
Doing so so far would have caused memory leaks.
With the new memleak-free mode of operation switched on in
drm_sched_fini() by providing the callback
nouveau_sched_fence_context_kill() the waitque is not necessary anymore.
Remove the waitque.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c | 20 +++++++-------------
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.h | 9 +++------
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c | 8 ++++----
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c
index 3659ac78bb3e..d9ac76198616 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c
@@ -121,11 +121,9 @@ nouveau_job_done(struct nouveau_job *job)
{
struct nouveau_sched *sched = job->sched;
- spin_lock(&sched->job.list.lock);
+ spin_lock(&sched->job_list.lock);
list_del(&job->entry);
- spin_unlock(&sched->job.list.lock);
-
- wake_up(&sched->job.wq);
+ spin_unlock(&sched->job_list.lock);
}
void
@@ -306,9 +304,9 @@ nouveau_job_submit(struct nouveau_job *job)
}
/* Submit was successful; add the job to the schedulers job list. */
- spin_lock(&sched->job.list.lock);
- list_add(&job->entry, &sched->job.list.head);
- spin_unlock(&sched->job.list.lock);
+ spin_lock(&sched->job_list.lock);
+ list_add(&job->entry, &sched->job_list.head);
+ spin_unlock(&sched->job_list.lock);
drm_sched_job_arm(&job->base);
job->done_fence = dma_fence_get(&job->base.s_fence->finished);
@@ -458,9 +456,8 @@ nouveau_sched_init(struct nouveau_sched *sched, struct nouveau_drm *drm,
goto fail_sched;
mutex_init(&sched->mutex);
- spin_lock_init(&sched->job.list.lock);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sched->job.list.head);
- init_waitqueue_head(&sched->job.wq);
+ spin_lock_init(&sched->job_list.lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sched->job_list.head);
return 0;
@@ -503,9 +500,6 @@ nouveau_sched_fini(struct nouveau_sched *sched)
struct drm_gpu_scheduler *drm_sched = &sched->base;
struct drm_sched_entity *entity = &sched->entity;
- rmb(); /* for list_empty to work without lock */
- wait_event(sched->job.wq, list_empty(&sched->job.list.head));
-
drm_sched_entity_fini(entity);
drm_sched_fini(drm_sched);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.h
index e6e2016a3569..339a14563fbb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.h
@@ -105,12 +105,9 @@ struct nouveau_sched {
struct nouveau_channel *chan;
struct {
- struct {
- struct list_head head;
- spinlock_t lock;
- } list;
- struct wait_queue_head wq;
- } job;
+ struct list_head head;
+ spinlock_t lock;
+ } job_list;
};
int nouveau_sched_create(struct nouveau_sched **psched, struct nouveau_drm *drm,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
index 48f105239f42..ddfc46bc1b3e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
@@ -1019,8 +1019,8 @@ bind_validate_map_sparse(struct nouveau_job *job, u64 addr, u64 range)
u64 end = addr + range;
again:
- spin_lock(&sched->job.list.lock);
- list_for_each_entry(__job, &sched->job.list.head, entry) {
+ spin_lock(&sched->job_list.lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(__job, &sched->job_list.head, entry) {
struct nouveau_uvmm_bind_job *bind_job = to_uvmm_bind_job(__job);
list_for_each_op(op, &bind_job->ops) {
@@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ bind_validate_map_sparse(struct nouveau_job *job, u64 addr, u64 range)
if (!(end <= op_addr || addr >= op_end)) {
nouveau_uvmm_bind_job_get(bind_job);
- spin_unlock(&sched->job.list.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&sched->job_list.lock);
wait_for_completion(&bind_job->complete);
nouveau_uvmm_bind_job_put(bind_job);
goto again;
@@ -1038,7 +1038,7 @@ bind_validate_map_sparse(struct nouveau_job *job, u64 addr, u64 range)
}
}
}
- spin_unlock(&sched->job.list.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&sched->job_list.lock);
}
static int
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-24 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 9:55 [PATCH v2 0/6] drm/sched: Fix memory leaks in drm_sched_fini() Philipp Stanner
2025-04-24 9:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/sched: Fix teardown leaks with waitqueue Philipp Stanner
2025-05-16 9:19 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-04-24 9:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/sched: Prevent teardown waitque from blocking too long Philipp Stanner
2025-05-16 9:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-05-16 9:53 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-05-16 10:19 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-05-16 10:54 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-05-16 11:35 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-05-16 12:00 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-05-16 15:48 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-05-16 9:54 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-05-16 10:34 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-04-24 9:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/sched: Warn if pending list is not empty Philipp Stanner
2025-05-16 9:40 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-04-24 9:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/nouveau: Add new callback for scheduler teardown Philipp Stanner
2025-04-24 9:55 ` Philipp Stanner [this message]
2025-04-24 9:55 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/sched: Port unit tests to new cleanup design Philipp Stanner
2025-05-08 11:03 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-05-08 12:51 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-05-12 8:00 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-05-14 8:30 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-05-14 9:19 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-05-16 9:00 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250424095535.26119-7-phasta@kernel.org \
--to=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox