The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: carlos.bilbao@kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, seanjc@google.com, jan.glauber@gmail.com,
	bilbao@vt.edu, pmladek@suse.com, jani.nikula@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	takakura@valinux.co.jp, john.ogness@linutronix.de,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Reduce CPU consumption after panic
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:39:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250429133941.063544bb4731df0ef802440c@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250429150638.1446781-1-carlos.bilbao@kernel.org>

(cc more x86 people)

On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 10:06:36 -0500 carlos.bilbao@kernel.org wrote:

> From: Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao@kernel.org>
> 
> Provide a priority-based mechanism to set the behavior of the kernel at
> the post-panic stage -- the current default is a waste of CPU except for
> cases with console that generate insightful output.
> 
> In v1 cover letter [1], I illustrated the potential to reduce unnecessary
> CPU resources with an experiment with VMs, reducing more than 70% of CPU
> usage. The main delta of v2 [2] was that, instead of a weak function that
> archs can overwrite, we provided a flexible priority-based mechanism
> (following suggestions by Sean Christopherson), panic_set_handling().
> 

An effect of this is that the blinky light will never again occur on
any x86, I think?  I don't know what might the effects of changing such
longstanding behavior.

Also, why was the `priority' feature added?  It has no effect in this
patchset.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-29 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-29 15:06 [PATCH v3 0/2] Reduce CPU consumption after panic carlos.bilbao
2025-04-29 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] panic: Allow for dynamic custom behavior " carlos.bilbao
2025-04-29 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/panic: Add x86_panic_handler as default post-panic behavior carlos.bilbao
2025-04-29 20:39 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2025-04-29 20:17   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Reduce CPU consumption after panic Carlos Bilbao
2025-04-29 22:53     ` Andrew Morton
2025-04-29 21:39       ` Carlos Bilbao
2025-04-29 21:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-29 20:32     ` Carlos Bilbao
2025-04-29 22:10       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-29 20:52         ` Carlos Bilbao
2025-04-30  8:48           ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 15:59             ` Sean Christopherson
2025-04-30 18:54             ` Carlos Bilbao
2025-05-01  8:55               ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-07 19:49                 ` Carlos Bilbao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250429133941.063544bb4731df0ef802440c@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bilbao@vt.edu \
    --cc=carlos.bilbao@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jan.glauber@gmail.com \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=takakura@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox