From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C1A72609C4 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:59:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746025199; cv=none; b=iHbCrrU7y/QGuwmla2PPjzmZILrji6HKIQUDW9dUP3bc1lKa4eylMnWYhWY1e5xR7hofXpo8hlQllyiXKV1BKA2lSfNszkV8GhJJaPHpOK/UsE2njZtglCczADtFHij8tetNKrKo4a2fPATuGvyH/SeEI4PvT3bDlbyrVDFekn4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746025199; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zLd4bDp57dG7iX53UvVTk+jZNYyvqIkgpPTsb3J6Uo4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bkogf4k5KNq+g+a8Fh68d81Z4ykfoXYccZti1h6SdpAEhXExtEVXg9KIqHM6hBrpP212ZzqlbPfpFsEHgG4MVbqzQk9VG5y2dLocI04+7INzTa4Tg4loxAZ4roOLwyHfSbkFB/ZQoALA9SW0KBHcJAFQfy7MEbWvD3QOnqX4nn8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=DDAEP5An; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=raOVk9+r; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="DDAEP5An"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="raOVk9+r" Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 16:59:54 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1746025195; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zLd4bDp57dG7iX53UvVTk+jZNYyvqIkgpPTsb3J6Uo4=; b=DDAEP5Anjssm+BsLv2RIOsRRcacEBdL3FNd6BOW7T6tsdvAKjz5yCXS2uTSXpWHmBzbzCb 0jyRxEmSkLu2B+ycXe9jAd8gKL37q57S2BgVGdZ4arJ0wWdGZ7FcDx1cMGvH3MQZ9nN8bg iMuX1NDgWgCSVasGNZV35Ufg08CoHo7VHoOR8xRNpLob73VnUwPxIgU3l/eO6hWXgA7I6v vXOXsvHv1P9DxbsHzr3L9+DFzVmX0thQMU1btUaN+11h39RePdv9ltDzQza7vPZ4ahNkZ4 9KBDi3JJCsxICxX+53eFhXIy36VcsaC/9ot3KkMbB1YOCUJ9oE47tsnokbVHSQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1746025195; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zLd4bDp57dG7iX53UvVTk+jZNYyvqIkgpPTsb3J6Uo4=; b=raOVk9+r369qzYKZXXhuUSRVfZOL4FuBpuhQfiPX4+Biz1LqfjFkHYFS8qqPvXYfDoBLIL ntGVLWmUQOJig2CQ== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Leonardo Bras Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Vlastimil Babka , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] local_lock: Minor improvements of local_trylock*() documentation Message-ID: <20250430145954.hsnIXmYO@linutronix.de> References: <20250430073610.163846-1-leobras@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250430073610.163846-1-leobras@redhat.com> On 2025-04-30 04:36:10 [-0300], Leonardo Bras wrote: > Fix local_trylock_init() documentation, as it was mentioning the non-try > helper instead, and use the opportunity to make clear the try_lock*() needs > to receive a try-enabled variable as parameter. Maybe replaced "try-enabled lock" with "local_trylock_t". "Try enabled lock" as mentioned in the documentation or "try-enabled variable" as here in the description does not really fit. > Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras Sebastian