Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf: Fix irq work dereferencing garbage

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 12:29:18PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > @@ -13951,18 +13943,25 @@ perf_event_exit_event(struct perf_event *event,
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Child events can be freed.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (is_child) {
> > -		if (parent_event) {
> > -			mutex_unlock(&parent_event->child_mutex);
> > -			/*
> > -			 * Kick perf_poll() for is_event_hup();
> > -			 */
> > -			perf_event_wakeup(parent_event);
> > +	if (parent_event) {
> > +		mutex_unlock(&parent_event->child_mutex);
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Kick perf_poll() for is_event_hup();
> > +		 */
> > +		perf_event_wakeup(parent_event);
> 
> Should not this perf_event_wakeup() be inside the next if() as well?
> doing anything on parent_event when !ATTACH_CHILD seems dodgy.

I made this change, and munged the original changelog on top and stuffed
the patches into queue/perf/core.


> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Match the refcount initialization. Make sure it doesn't happen
> > +		 * twice if pmu_detach_event() calls it on an already exited task.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_CHILD) {
> >  			/*
> >  			 * pmu_detach_event() will have an extra refcount.
> > +			 * perf_pending_task() might have one too.
> >  			 */
> >  			put_event(event);
> >  		}
> > +
> >  		return;
> >  	}