From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
To: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] bcachefs: Add comments for inode snapshot requirements
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 15:59:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250502200002.1309862-3-kent.overstreet@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250502200002.1309862-1-kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
---
fs/bcachefs/io_write.c | 6 ++++++
fs/bcachefs/xattr.c | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/io_write.c b/fs/bcachefs/io_write.c
index add141ac45b5..399df8fede8b 100644
--- a/fs/bcachefs/io_write.c
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/io_write.c
@@ -279,6 +279,12 @@ static inline int bch2_extent_update_i_size_sectors(struct btree_trans *trans,
inode_update_flags = 0;
}
+ /*
+ * extents, dirents and xattrs updates require that an inode update also
+ * happens - to ensure that if a key exists in one of those btrees with
+ * a given snapshot ID an inode is also present - so we may have to skip
+ * the nojournal optimization:
+ */
if (inode->k.p.snapshot != iter.snapshot) {
inode->k.p.snapshot = iter.snapshot;
inode_update_flags = 0;
diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/xattr.c b/fs/bcachefs/xattr.c
index b8bc2fb04f15..ea3f87f6fe49 100644
--- a/fs/bcachefs/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/xattr.c
@@ -176,6 +176,11 @@ int bch2_xattr_set(struct btree_trans *trans, subvol_inum inum,
if (ret)
return ret;
+ /*
+ * Besides the ctime update, extents, dirents and xattrs updates require
+ * that an inode update also happens - to ensure that if a key exists in
+ * one of those btrees with a given snapshot ID an inode is also present
+ */
inode_u->bi_ctime = bch2_current_time(c);
ret = bch2_inode_write(trans, &inode_iter, inode_u);
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-02 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-02 19:59 [PATCH 0/8] Snapshot deletion improvements Kent Overstreet
2025-05-02 19:59 ` [PATCH 1/8] bcachefs: snapshot delete progress indicator Kent Overstreet
2025-05-02 19:59 ` Kent Overstreet [this message]
2025-05-02 19:59 ` [PATCH 3/8] bcachefs: kill inode_walker_entry.snapshot Kent Overstreet
2025-05-02 19:59 ` [PATCH 4/8] bcachefs: BCH_FSCK_ERR_snapshot_key_missing_inode_snapshot Kent Overstreet
2025-05-02 19:59 ` [PATCH 5/8] bcachefs: Skip unrelated snapshot trees in snapshot deletion Kent Overstreet
2025-05-02 19:59 ` [PATCH 6/8] bcachefs: BCH_SNAPSHOT_DELETED -> BCH_SNAPSHOT_WILL_DELETE Kent Overstreet
2025-05-02 19:59 ` [PATCH 7/8] bcachefs: bcachefs_metadata_version_snapshot_deletion_v2 Kent Overstreet
2025-05-02 20:00 ` [PATCH 8/8] bcachefs: delete_dead_snapshot_keys_v2() Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250502200002.1309862-3-kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--to=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox