From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 110C71DDC18; Sat, 3 May 2025 10:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746267050; cv=none; b=HIV4Z3tOscpPjDtgPV0l8F7GU8fqpPIw11u/d1htVmm5DCK98ERrwnFtbQBTXRkbykUTryVIt8IrNpNFu3HyzJQ9pTpM9RiOzJ6vpkkWVY1RL3z/GTn5gZ0zuF04BF21tx2hN5kNcUPTg1W1fV/m8ujzwLYl9js4dmr1PxZEkv0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746267050; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xk/wEgqqIO2by4Z2qvxQ7ilU/SdwMkhsAd06Cg0FC4E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=TdevJW3Cp8UO6bmNZ2yzCOzkAuTFj5aSPPueBwAOG6D2Ujl9skK+rsnS+/aWmrlKeoV9LtyRtbdQjTJBisEtmnOEySUAKlvEsr7ovoPfGiHxixUU6gCWONlBc27u4TPSl8VbIY1eaVobK7iXGVEecRr4A3fLAQ0CTyjKT7/NcKU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=YfpvM7H/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="YfpvM7H/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1746267048; x=1777803048; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=xk/wEgqqIO2by4Z2qvxQ7ilU/SdwMkhsAd06Cg0FC4E=; b=YfpvM7H/3qN4l2C1Bfnnms9DXbxHUndcxWNIfITVwVXT2/PjVIWZr1UM n3lLpKTYaXYo0hdBTKmNeHDDV5YVzKMkOIf0999IMDJNLrZIR4YgeQ7Le 927dZJJhLxDJI4DxgnMEVb8oaDYpu6kNu3ZyzPN1CdOtx7udvL+b0P3FU j81MSkbq07mWKks1svvSGu7kTZJmwil7vvLMmYIYVLVJWWvTVFDsjgH2c nJqDXarICUzjnEsZ227bBXiI7j3z4fbJ80NNtkdERMdfGuPFmKK6Kpoao NDSxyljgKNPakQ0OJi3in9O/R/t22MCRaOcOEaBiqVwDnMknr4KinRqbK g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: MXiKWX7aRYi3FHo/2bCaQA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Q1AyCUmUTmagDo9cMZ+Z+Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11421"; a="47821848" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,258,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="47821848" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 May 2025 03:10:47 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: BNpdvW4RT16cYCbbG1zdoQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Np7Cl7wiQS6yWBIt/JW9VA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,258,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="139986440" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 1992f890471c) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 May 2025 03:10:45 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 1992f890471c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uB9pS-0005I9-1Q; Sat, 03 May 2025 10:10:42 +0000 Date: Sat, 3 May 2025 18:10:14 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Masami Hiramatsu , Mark Rutland , Mathieu Desnoyers , Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] tracing: branch: Use trace_tracing_is_on_cpu() instead of "disabled" field Message-ID: <202505031738.buFg2SBt-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250502205349.299144667@goodmis.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250502205349.299144667@goodmis.org> Hi Steven, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on trace/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.15-rc4 next-20250502] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Steven-Rostedt/tracing-mmiotrace-Remove-reference-to-unused-per-CPU-data-pointer/20250503-050317 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250502205349.299144667%40goodmis.org patch subject: [PATCH 09/12] tracing: branch: Use trace_tracing_is_on_cpu() instead of "disabled" field config: arc-randconfig-001-20250503 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250503/202505031738.buFg2SBt-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arc-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250503/202505031738.buFg2SBt-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505031738.buFg2SBt-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/trace/trace_branch.c: In function 'probe_likely_condition': >> kernel/trace/trace_branch.c:56:43: error: implicit declaration of function 'raw_smp_process_id'; did you mean 'raw_smp_processor_id'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 56 | if (!tracer_tracing_is_on_cpu(tr, raw_smp_process_id())) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | raw_smp_processor_id vim +56 kernel/trace/trace_branch.c 29 30 static void 31 probe_likely_condition(struct ftrace_likely_data *f, int val, int expect) 32 { 33 struct trace_array *tr = branch_tracer; 34 struct trace_buffer *buffer; 35 struct ring_buffer_event *event; 36 struct trace_branch *entry; 37 unsigned long flags; 38 unsigned int trace_ctx; 39 const char *p; 40 41 if (current->trace_recursion & TRACE_BRANCH_BIT) 42 return; 43 44 /* 45 * I would love to save just the ftrace_likely_data pointer, but 46 * this code can also be used by modules. Ugly things can happen 47 * if the module is unloaded, and then we go and read the 48 * pointer. This is slower, but much safer. 49 */ 50 51 if (unlikely(!tr)) 52 return; 53 54 raw_local_irq_save(flags); 55 current->trace_recursion |= TRACE_BRANCH_BIT; > 56 if (!tracer_tracing_is_on_cpu(tr, raw_smp_process_id())) 57 goto out; 58 59 trace_ctx = tracing_gen_ctx_flags(flags); 60 buffer = tr->array_buffer.buffer; 61 event = trace_buffer_lock_reserve(buffer, TRACE_BRANCH, 62 sizeof(*entry), trace_ctx); 63 if (!event) 64 goto out; 65 66 entry = ring_buffer_event_data(event); 67 68 /* Strip off the path, only save the file */ 69 p = f->data.file + strlen(f->data.file); 70 while (p >= f->data.file && *p != '/') 71 p--; 72 p++; 73 74 strscpy(entry->func, f->data.func); 75 strscpy(entry->file, p); 76 entry->constant = f->constant; 77 entry->line = f->data.line; 78 entry->correct = val == expect; 79 80 trace_buffer_unlock_commit_nostack(buffer, event); 81 82 out: 83 current->trace_recursion &= ~TRACE_BRANCH_BIT; 84 raw_local_irq_restore(flags); 85 } 86 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki