Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 00/34] drm: convert all bridges to devm_drm_bridge_alloc()

[Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>]

Hi Dmitry,

On Mon, 5 May 2025 14:58:58 +0300
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:

> On 05/05/2025 14:06, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> > Inki, Kyungmin, Seung-Woo, Alim,
> > 
> > On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 10:08:14 +0200
> > Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> wrote:
> >   
> >> Inki, Kyungmin, Seung-Woo, sorry for the mishap. Do you agree with the
> >> following patch, and it going through drm-misc?
> >>
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20250424-drm-bridge-convert-to-alloc-api-v2-14-8f91a404d86b@bootlin.com/
> >>
> >> If not, we'll revert.  
> > 
> > Did you have a chance to have a look at the patch mentioned by Maxime?
> > 
> > It was applied to drm-misc-next by mistake. Not your mistake of course,
> > but now it's there so if you don't reply anything it will have to be
> > reverted, and then sent again to go through all the review process to
> > be hopefully re-applied in the future.
> > 
> > If you agree with keeping it in drm-misc-next, that would be less noise
> > for everybody.
> > 
> > I'm going to send v3 very soon, so it would be good to decide what to
> > do before that.  
> 
> For the record: even though I'm not happy with msm-related patches going 
> through drm-misc without additional ack from our side, I think reverting 
> those and reapplying them later will create a bigger mess. So, I'm fine 
> with keeping drm/msm/* bridged patches in.

That was my understanding of your previous e-mail, but thanks for
having made it explicit.

Luca

-- 
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com