From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/10] net: faster and simpler CRC32C computation
Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 10:29:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250511172929.GA1239@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b9b0f188-d873-43ff-b1e1-259e2afdda6c@lunn.ch>
On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 06:30:25PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 05:41:00PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > Update networking code that computes the CRC32C of packets to just call
> > crc32c() without unnecessary abstraction layers. The result is faster
> > and simpler code.
>
> Hi Eric
>
> Do you have some benchmarks for these changes?
>
> Andrew
Do you want benchmarks that show that removing the indirect calls makes things
faster? I think that should be fairly self-evident by now after dealing with
retpoline for years, but I can provide more details if you need them.
Removing the inefficient use of crc32c_combine() makes a massive difference on
fragmented sk_buffs, since crc32c_combine() is so slow (much slower than the CRC
calculation itself). However, reverting the workaround commit 4c2f24549644
("sctp: linearize early if it's not GSO") is beyond the scope of this patchset,
so for now the sctp stack doesn't actually call skb_crc32c() on fragmented
sk_buffs. I can provide microbenchmarks of skb_crc32c() on a fragmented sk_buff
directly though, if you don't think it's clear already.
Of course, please also keep in mind the -118 line diffstat. Even if it wasn't
faster we should just do it this way anyway.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-11 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-11 0:41 [PATCH net-next 00/10] net: faster and simpler CRC32C computation Eric Biggers
2025-05-11 0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] net: introduce CONFIG_NET_CRC32C Eric Biggers
2025-05-11 0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] net: add skb_crc32c() Eric Biggers
2025-05-11 0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] net: use skb_crc32c() in skb_crc32c_csum_help() Eric Biggers
2025-05-11 0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] RDMA/siw: use skb_crc32c() instead of __skb_checksum() Eric Biggers
2025-05-15 20:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-05-15 20:12 ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-16 10:42 ` Bernard Metzler
2025-05-19 9:04 ` Bernard Metzler
2025-05-20 13:18 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-05-20 15:18 ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-21 10:38 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-05-11 0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] sctp: " Eric Biggers
2025-05-11 0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] net: fold __skb_checksum() into skb_checksum() Eric Biggers
2025-05-11 0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] lib/crc32: remove unused support for CRC32C combination Eric Biggers
2025-05-11 0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] net: add skb_copy_and_crc32c_datagram_iter() Eric Biggers
2025-05-13 21:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-05-15 18:09 ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-11 0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] nvme-tcp: use crc32c() and skb_copy_and_crc32c_datagram_iter() Eric Biggers
2025-05-16 4:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-05-16 5:31 ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-16 6:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-05-17 17:45 ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-17 20:32 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-05-17 9:58 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-05-17 17:29 ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-17 20:30 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-05-11 0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] net: remove skb_copy_and_hash_datagram_iter() Eric Biggers
2025-05-11 16:30 ` [PATCH net-next 00/10] net: faster and simpler CRC32C computation Andrew Lunn
2025-05-11 17:29 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2025-05-11 21:22 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-05-11 21:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-11 23:07 ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-15 19:21 ` David Laight
2025-05-15 19:50 ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-13 21:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-05-15 18:10 ` Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250511172929.GA1239@sol \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).