Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/569] 6.1.129-rc2 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 11:21:20AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Sat 2025-02-22 10:39:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 10:21:18AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Sat 2025-02-22 07:28:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 09:45:15AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > On 2/20/2025 2:57 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.129 release.
> > > > > > There are 569 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > > let me know.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Responses should be made by Sat, 22 Feb 2025 10:44:04 +0000.
> > > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > > 
> > > > > And yet there was a v6.1.29 tag created already?
> > > > 
> > > > Sometimes I'm faster, which is usually the case for -rc2 and later, I go
> > > > off of the -rc1 date if the people that had problems with -rc1 have
> > > > reported that the newer -rc fixes their reported issues.
> > > 
> > > Well, quoting time down to second then doing something completely
> > > different is quite confusing. Please fix your scripts.
> > 
> > Patches gladly welcome :)
> 
> It is not okay to send misleading emails just because script generated
> them.

*plonk*