public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
	ctshao@google.com, tmricht@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/15] perf: Fix the throttle logic for a group
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 11:45:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250513094505.GD25891@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250513094155.GD25763@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 11:41:55AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 09:47:26AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> > index a84abc2b7f20..eb0dc871f4f1 100644
> > --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> > @@ -2734,6 +2734,38 @@ void perf_event_disable_inatomic(struct perf_event *event)
> >  static void perf_log_throttle(struct perf_event *event, int enable);
> >  static void perf_log_itrace_start(struct perf_event *event);
> >  
> > +static void perf_event_group_unthrottle(struct perf_event *event, bool start_event)
> > +{
> > +	struct perf_event *leader = event->group_leader;
> > +	struct perf_event *sibling;
> > +
> > +	if (leader != event || start_event)
> > +		leader->pmu->start(leader, 0);
> > +	leader->hw.interrupts = 0;
> > +
> > +	for_each_sibling_event(sibling, leader) {
> > +		if (sibling != event || start_event)
> > +			sibling->pmu->start(sibling, 0);
> > +		sibling->hw.interrupts = 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	perf_log_throttle(leader, 1);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void perf_event_group_throttle(struct perf_event *event)
> > +{
> > +	struct perf_event *leader = event->group_leader;
> > +	struct perf_event *sibling;
> > +
> > +	leader->hw.interrupts = MAX_INTERRUPTS;
> > +	leader->pmu->stop(leader, 0);
> > +
> > +	for_each_sibling_event(sibling, leader)
> > +		sibling->pmu->stop(sibling, 0);
> > +
> > +	perf_log_throttle(leader, 0);
> > +}
> 
> Urgh, this seems inconsistent at best.
> 
>  - unthrottle will set interrupts to 0 for the whole group
>  - throttle will set interrupts for leader
>    while the old code would set interrupts for event.
>  - interrupts was written with event stopped, while now you consistently
>    write when started
>  - both now issue perf_log_throttle() on leader, whereas previously it
>    was issued on event.
> 
> IOW
> 
> before:				after:
>  event stops			 leader MAX_INTERRUPTS
>  event MAX_INTERRUPTS		 event group stops
>  event logs			 leader logs
> 
>  event 0			 event group 0
>  event starts			 event group starts
>  event logs			 leader logs

Sorry, that should obviously be:

  event 0			 event group starts
  event starts			 event group 0
  event logs			 leader logs


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-13  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-06 16:47 [RFC PATCH 00/15] perf: Fix the throttle logic for group kan.liang
2025-05-06 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 01/15] perf: Fix the throttle logic for a group kan.liang
2025-05-07 16:52   ` Ian Rogers
2025-05-07 19:00     ` Liang, Kan
2025-05-13  9:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-13  9:45     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-05-13 14:47     ` Liang, Kan
2025-05-06 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 02/15] perf/x86/intel: Remove driver-specific throttle support kan.liang
2025-05-06 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 03/15] perf/x86/amd: " kan.liang
2025-05-13  8:44   ` Ravi Bangoria
2025-05-06 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 04/15] perf/x86/zhaoxin: " kan.liang
2025-05-06 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 05/15] powerpc/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-06 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 06/15] s390/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-06 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 07/15] perf/arm: " kan.liang
2025-05-06 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 08/15] perf/apple_m1: " kan.liang
2025-05-06 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 09/15] alpha/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-06 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 10/15] arc/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-06 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 11/15] csky/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-06 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 12/15] loongarch/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-07  1:17   ` 陈华才
2025-05-07 13:45     ` Liang, Kan
2025-05-06 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 13/15] sparc/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-06 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 14/15] xtensa/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-11 20:43   ` Max Filippov
2025-05-06 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 15/15] mips/perf: " kan.liang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250513094505.GD25891@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ctshao@google.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox